How Can Two Qubits Interacting with Photons Be Simplified Using Pauli Operators?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xlh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamiltonian
xlh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
please see the following Hamiltonian mode.
two two-level atoms(or two qubits) interact with photon.
á、à are the creation and annihilation operators of photon
please rewriting H in the way of pauli operators , will looks very simple

H = E1 ( |e1><e1| -|g1><g1| ) + E2 ( |e2><e2| -|g2><g2| ) + hωáà

+ g (á + à ) ( |g1><e1|.|g2><e2| + |g1><e1|.|e2><g2| + |e1><g1|.|g2><e2| +|e1><g1|.|e2><g2|)

considering the case of resonant interaction and Rotating Wave Approximation , only two interaction terms exist

I have no ideas to make use of the H.
I want to cite some ideas from Quantum Optics or other areas.( besides entanglement of two atoms)

Would you please tell me the documents If someone have seen the mode?
Would you please tell me some ideas?

thanks very much!

Xiaoling He
xlhfudan@yahoo.com
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See Mandel and Wolf, Optical Coherrence and Quantum Optics, Chap. 15, all about photons and 2 level atoms (Bloch and Rabi were key players in the development of this now mature field. Also, Cohen-Tannoudji et all cover the subject in their Atom-Photon Interactions -- Basic Processes and Applications. There's also newer work, based on work by Jaynes dealing with exact solutions, which can be found via Google.

Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top