How Can We Determine the Optimum Number of Terms for a Convergent Series?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lokofer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series Sum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the optimum number of terms, K, for a convergent series defined by a recurrence relation. The concept of "optimum" is questioned, as it lacks a clear definition, making it difficult to ascertain K or the series sum. Clarification is sought on the terms K and k, with confusion regarding whether k refers to the sum of the first k terms or an infinite subset. It is noted that a second-order recurrence relation may be solvable, and any finite sum of finite terms will always converge. The conversation highlights the complexities of defining convergence in the context of infinite series and finite sums.
lokofer
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
Let be the series...S=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a(n)

where a(0)=1=a(1) and the rest of coefficients satisfy a recurrence relation (linear or non-linear) so F(n,a_{n+2} , a_{n+1},a_{n})=n :-p :-p ..then my question is let's suppose that the series has an "optimum number of terms" K so if you take k-terms the series converges to a optimum value, otherwise the series (taking all terms) diverges) my question is how would we obtain this k and the sum of the series... a "brute force" algorithm would say that you take a big number of terms and solve the recurrence by using a computer...:rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Since you have not defined optimum the question is impossible to answer.

When you use K and k are we supposed to think they refer to the same thing? What is a k-term? Do you just mean sum the first k terms (so why use the word convergent for a finite sum?), or do you mean to pick some infinite subset of the terms?

Your recurrence relation could very well be easy to solve (it is only a second order recurrence relation, as written.
 
Last edited:
The sum of a finite number of finite terms always converges. If your ininite sum is divergent, then any stopping point will put you in the situation you mention.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top