MHB How can we factor $\displaystyle x^4 + 1$ into the difference of two squares?

  • Thread starter Thread starter paulmdrdo1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factoring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on factoring the expression \(x^4 + 1\) into the difference of two squares. One method presented involves rewriting the expression as \(x^4 + 2x^2 + 1 - 2x^2\), which can be factored as \((x^2 + 1)^2 - (\sqrt{2} x)^2\). This leads to the final factorization of \((x^2 - \sqrt{2} x + 1)(x^2 + \sqrt{2} x + 1)\). The reasoning behind choosing the term \(2x^2\) is linked to completing the square, making it easier to factor the expression. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the technique of completing the square to facilitate factoring.
paulmdrdo1
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
how to force factor this into the difference of two squares.

$\displaystyle x^4 + 1$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: brushing up on factoring.

$$x^4+1=x^4+2x^2+1-2x^2$$

or

$$x^4+1=x^4-i^2$$

The rest is for you ;)
 
Re: brushing up on factoring.

I would get this

$\displaystyle \displaystyle \begin{align*} x^4 + 1 &= x^4 + 2x^2 + 1 - 2x^2 \\& = \left( x^2 + 1 \right) ^2 - \left( \sqrt{2} \, x \right) ^2 \\& = \left( x^2 - \sqrt{2}\, x + 1 \right) \left( x^2 + \sqrt{2}\,x + 1 \right) \end{align*}$

but i want to know what's your reasoning by choosing the term 2x^2?
 
Re: brushing up on factoring.

paulmdrdo said:
I would get this

$\displaystyle \displaystyle \begin{align*} x^4 + 1 &= x^4 + 2x^2 + 1 - 2x^2 \\& = \left( x^2 + 1 \right) ^2 - \left( \sqrt{2} \, x \right) ^2 \\& = \left( x^2 - \sqrt{2}\, x + 1 \right) \left( x^2 + \sqrt{2}\,x + 1 \right) \end{align*}$

but i want to know what's your reasoning by choosing the term 2x^2?

The idea is complete the square , since if we have for example :

$$x^2+1$$ our first glance suggests converting it to $x^2+2x+1$ which is a complete square hence factorizing will be possible .
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top