MHB How can we factor $\displaystyle x^4 + 1$ into the difference of two squares?

  • Thread starter Thread starter paulmdrdo1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factoring
paulmdrdo1
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
how to force factor this into the difference of two squares.

$\displaystyle x^4 + 1$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: brushing up on factoring.

$$x^4+1=x^4+2x^2+1-2x^2$$

or

$$x^4+1=x^4-i^2$$

The rest is for you ;)
 
Re: brushing up on factoring.

I would get this

$\displaystyle \displaystyle \begin{align*} x^4 + 1 &= x^4 + 2x^2 + 1 - 2x^2 \\& = \left( x^2 + 1 \right) ^2 - \left( \sqrt{2} \, x \right) ^2 \\& = \left( x^2 - \sqrt{2}\, x + 1 \right) \left( x^2 + \sqrt{2}\,x + 1 \right) \end{align*}$

but i want to know what's your reasoning by choosing the term 2x^2?
 
Re: brushing up on factoring.

paulmdrdo said:
I would get this

$\displaystyle \displaystyle \begin{align*} x^4 + 1 &= x^4 + 2x^2 + 1 - 2x^2 \\& = \left( x^2 + 1 \right) ^2 - \left( \sqrt{2} \, x \right) ^2 \\& = \left( x^2 - \sqrt{2}\, x + 1 \right) \left( x^2 + \sqrt{2}\,x + 1 \right) \end{align*}$

but i want to know what's your reasoning by choosing the term 2x^2?

The idea is complete the square , since if we have for example :

$$x^2+1$$ our first glance suggests converting it to $x^2+2x+1$ which is a complete square hence factorizing will be possible .
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top