How can we generalize this proof to infinite dimensional vector spaces?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maybe_Memorie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Maybe_Memorie
Messages
346
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let V be a vector space. Show that for every three linear operators
A,B,C: V -> V, we have
rk(ABC) =< rk(B)

Homework Equations



V = rk(A) + dimKer(A)

rk(A) = dimIm(A)

The Attempt at a Solution



Im(ABC) = {ABC(v) | vEV}
= {AB(C(v)) | vEV}

So Im(ABC) is a subset of Im(AB)

So dimIm(ABC) =< dimIm(AB)

So rk(ABC) =< rk(AB)

Im(AB) = {A(B(w)) | wEV}

Ker(B) subset of ker(AB) because if Bx=0, then ABx = A0 = 0

By the dimension formula, this leads to rk(B) >= rk(AB)

So putting the two results together we get rk(ABC) =< rk(B)


Is this correct? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Maybe_Memorie! :smile:

Your proof seems correct! But it seems you'll need V to be finite dimensional for it to work.
 
micromass said:
Hi Maybe_Memorie! :smile:

Your proof seems correct! But it seems you'll need V to be finite dimensional for it to work.

We've only dealt with finite dimensional vector spaces.
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top