How can we improve motor control for our robotic television camera positioners?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on improving motor control for robotic television camera positioners, specifically using flat pack brushless DC motors with a 5-wire onboard control system. The team is facing challenges with achieving a "dead" spot at the center of a two-axis joystick, which is necessary to ensure zero speed when the joystick is not engaged. They require a transition from a "creep" speed to approximately 30-40 degrees per second. Suggestions include implementing built-in hysteresis around the 5V center voltage to create the desired dead zone. The team plans to consult with the motor manufacturer, Maxon, for potential solutions.
horngroup
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
We are many years out of school. We are building robotic positioners for television cameras. Our experience in the mechanical design is extensive. We are seeking direction in motor control. The motors which we would like to try are flat pack brushless dc motors with 5 wire on board control. The manufacturer can supply with an input which causes rotation in one direction from 0-5v and reverses from 5-10v. We use a two axis joystick as we rotate horizontally and vertically. We have trouble with our control at center rest of the joystick, as we need a "dead" spot in the center to insure 0 speed. We need to go from a "creep" speed to about 30-40 deg/sec. We would think that with allthe robotics out there this is reinventing the wheel. Any help out there?
Horngroup
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
horngroup said:
We are many years out of school. We are building robotic positioners for television cameras. Our experience in the mechanical design is extensive. We are seeking direction in motor control. The motors which we would like to try are flat pack brushless dc motors with 5 wire on board control. The manufacturer can supply with an input which causes rotation in one direction from 0-5v and reverses from 5-10v. We use a two axis joystick as we rotate horizontally and vertically. We have trouble with our control at center rest of the joystick, as we need a "dead" spot in the center to insure 0 speed. We need to go from a "creep" speed to about 30-40 deg/sec. We would think that with allthe robotics out there this is reinventing the wheel. Any help out there?
Horngroup

So zero rotation velocity is achieved around 5V? The manufacturer should have some built-in hysteresis around this center voltage, so that you get the dead spot that you want. Something like 100mV hysteresis or so. Or basically a 100mV dead zone around 5V that gives zero rotational velocity. Can they give that to you?
 
Thanks for the reply. We'll check with the motor people (Maxon)
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top