How Can We Model and Simplify the Melting of an Ice Cube?

kimmyS
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, I am new to this forum. I am taking an undergraduate thermodynamics course and got stumped by this problem. I found this forum and figured that someone here would be able to help me with this! :-p

Homework Statement


Develop a model for melting of an ice cube. What assumptions can/need to be made? What is difficult about this problem? What type of simple experiment could be conducted to test the solution?

Homework Equations


Which equations would be appropriate to develop this model?

The Attempt at a Solution


Initially you only have convection of the air around the ice cube to worry about. However, as the ice melts, you have a growing pool of water developing around the ice cube that changes temperature with time. This complicates matters even more. One way to simplify this would be to put the ice on a grating to allow the water to drip off. Then you only need to worry about the air convection.

Please, any help would be great! Thanks! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some more complications:

The ice cube changes shape as it melts.

There will be evaporation of the film of water covering the cube.
 
more complications
Heat conduction from the surface it is sitting upon.
Radiation heating if it is in a lit area.

Simple experiment, do the whole thing in a calorimeter.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top