Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,920
- 48
I am reading J. J. Duistermaat and J. A. C. Kolk: Multidimensional Analysis Vol.II Chapter 6: Integration ...
I need help with the proof of Theorem 6.2.8 Part (iii) ...The Definition of Riemann integrable functions with compact support and Theorem 6.2.8 and a brief indication of its proof reads as follows:
The definition of supremum and infimum are given in the following text from D&K Vol. I ...
I cannot locate D&K's definition of sup and inf for functions so I am taking the definition from Joseph L. Taylor's book, "Foundations of Analysis".
Taylor's definition reads as follows:
If [math]f: X \to \mathbb{R}[/math] is a real-valued function and [math] A \subset X [/math] ... ... ...
... then we define ..
[math] \text{ sup}_B = \text{sup} \{ f(x) \ | \ x \in B \} [/math]
and
[math] \text{ inf}_B = \text{inf} \{ f(x) \ | \ x \in B \} [/math]
I need help to formulate a detailed, formal and rigorous proof that [math] \text{ sup}_B \ fg - \text{ inf}_B \ fg \leq \text{ sup}_B \ f \text{ sup}_B \ g \ - \ \text{ inf}_B \ f \text{ inf}_B \ g [/math]I have been unable to make a meaningful start on this proof ...Help will be much appreciated ...
Peter
I need help with the proof of Theorem 6.2.8 Part (iii) ...The Definition of Riemann integrable functions with compact support and Theorem 6.2.8 and a brief indication of its proof reads as follows:
I cannot locate D&K's definition of sup and inf for functions so I am taking the definition from Joseph L. Taylor's book, "Foundations of Analysis".
Taylor's definition reads as follows:
If [math]f: X \to \mathbb{R}[/math] is a real-valued function and [math] A \subset X [/math] ... ... ...
... then we define ..
[math] \text{ sup}_B = \text{sup} \{ f(x) \ | \ x \in B \} [/math]
and
[math] \text{ inf}_B = \text{inf} \{ f(x) \ | \ x \in B \} [/math]
I need help to formulate a detailed, formal and rigorous proof that [math] \text{ sup}_B \ fg - \text{ inf}_B \ fg \leq \text{ sup}_B \ f \text{ sup}_B \ g \ - \ \text{ inf}_B \ f \text{ inf}_B \ g [/math]I have been unable to make a meaningful start on this proof ...Help will be much appreciated ...
Peter
Last edited: