How can we prove the injectivity of f(x) = x³ + x without using calculus?

MorallyObtuse
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi,

How do I prove that this functions is injective?

a.) f : x --> x³ + x x ∈ R

f(a) = a³ + a, f(b) = b³ + b
f(a) = f(b) => a³ + a = b³ + b => a³ = b³
=> a = b
therefore f is one-to-one
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If this is a homework problem, it should be posted in the homework forums here: https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=152

Now, to answer your question, assume that for some a \neq b we have that f(a) = f(b). If you can arrive at a contradiction from this, then that will prove that f is injective.
 
How do you conclude:
a³ + a = b³ + b => a³ = b³?
That is pretty much just as hard as showing f injective. How much math have you had? If you have had calculus simply show that it's continuous and strictly increasing (positive derivative). If you don't know calculus, but know that x is strictly increasing and x^3 is increasing, then you can conclude that f(x) is strictly increasing because it's the sum of a strictly increasing and an increasing function, and it's continuous, but this implies that it's injective.

If you want to brute-force it, do as you did till you reach:
a^3 + a = b^3 + b
Move to one side and factor like:
\begin{align*} 0 &amp;= a^3 -b^3+ a-b \\<br /> &amp;= (a-b)(a^2-ab+b^2) + (a-b) \\<br /> &amp;= (a-b)(a^2 +b^2 - ab + 1) \end{align*}
for this to hold you must have a=b, or
a^2 +b^2 - ab + 1 = 0
which you can show is a contradiction for real numbers (consider for instance the discriminant).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top