How can we say star mass affects event horizon diameter ?

AI Thread Summary
Star mass influences the diameter of a black hole's event horizon, but the singularity at the core complicates this relationship. When two stars of different masses collapse into black holes, they both create singularities, yet their event horizons differ due to their initial masses. The Schwarzschild metric provides a mathematical framework that relates mass to event horizon radius, as outlined in general relativity. Understanding this relationship requires accepting the theoretical nature of singularities, which remain poorly understood within quantum theory. Ultimately, while mass is a key factor in determining event horizon size, the complexities of black hole physics challenge our complete understanding.
PhyHunter
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
PLEASE LOOK ATTACHMENT!
Star mass affects event horizons diameter.But we know that Black hole's foundation is singularity so we can understand that singularity affects event horizon diameter.
Example:Imagine there are two stars, first star mass is 5 star mass second one is 7 star mass so If we think when they transform black hole both of them wiil be create singularity.So there are two same singularity.We know singularity affects event horizon diameter. How can we say star mass affects event horizon diameter.
How can we understand that r1 is longer than r ? (please look attachment)
 

Attachments

  • S?ngularity.png
    S?ngularity.png
    7.7 KB · Views: 550
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The concept of the singularity is purely theoretical. Since it is contradicted by quantum theory, no one really knows what happens inside a black hole. The diameter of the event horizon is determined by the mass, irrespective of what happens inside.
 
How did Physicists find this equations ? Have you any idea about this subject ?
 
The Schwarzschild metric is an exact solution to Einstein's field equations.
 
You can only understand [or maybe 'accept'] the relationship between mass and the radius of an event horizon from the mathematics of general relativity.

There are some good general insights here in sections 5 and 6 which may be of interest.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity#Black_holes_and_other_compact_objects

But especially when starting out, there is not a lot of 'logic' to an event horizon. It is useful to keep in mind that, as always in relativity, different observers may record different observations. And different geometries expose different aspects of black holes and horizons.

Massive gas clouds may coalesce to form a stellar object, like a star. After sufficient energy and heat is expelled from a stellar object, after billions upon billions of years when it's nuclear fuel is largely used, then gravity has sufficient strength to cause some collapse of the remaining matter. What we think we understand is that highly compressed matter, called degenerate matter, might prevent the formation of a black hole in a stellar object with insufficient mass. But once the mass is sufficiently large, collapse to a singularity with an event horizon seems inevitable. Exactly what remains is uncertain.

For more reading, check out supermassive black hole in Wikipedia.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top