How can we systematically derive Casimir operators for graded Lie algebras?

  • Thread starter Thread starter petergreat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator Susy
petergreat
Messages
266
Reaction score
4
I followed a book on SUSY where the SUSY Casimir operator, modified from the Pauli-Lubanski vector, is stated and then proven to commute with all SUSY generators. However, I'm wondering whether there's a systematic approach of deriving the Casimir operator, other than trial-and-error? Is there a general method of deriving Casimir operators for an arbitrary graded Lie algebra?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Generally, the idea is to start with [T_a, T_b] = f_ab^c T_c, form adjoint rep ad_T_a = J_a, then form the Killing form g_ab = Tr(J_aJ_b), find its inverse g^ab such that g^ab g_bc = del^a_c, form the dual basis elements J^a = g^ab J_b, and then finally, the Casimir invariant is given by C = J_a J^a = g^ab J_a J_b. Looking at the definition of g_ab, we see that this is a symmetric metric, as one would hope for. Other representations of C can be formed as well; it'd simply be C = g^ab T_a T_b.

More details here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_invariant

Edit: What I said applies to algebras. I assume you would need to modify this some for superalgebras; Tr -> Str and so on. I don't think anything out of the ordinary happens beyond that, but I'm not positive. I'm less familiar with superalgebras.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top