A How Can Wigner's Friend Experiment Influence Novel Plots in Quantum Mechanics?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter sayetsu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wigner's friend
sayetsu
Messages
46
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
What are some proposed ones, esp involving Markus Muller's ideas?
I'm working on a novel involving QM ideas. What I'm most excited about is the prospect of taking a view on Markus Muller's propositions involving reality and algorithmic information theory. I'm trying to make it work with the Wigner's Friend thought experiment. Are there any ideas on how subjective realities could interact, or is solipsism our best guess? :O
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sayetsu said:
I'm working on a novel involving QM ideas.

Novels are not restricted to the actual laws of physics that hold in our universe. So if you want to discuss possible ideas for a novel, you should open a thread in the SciFi forum. Threads here should be restricted to the actual laws of our universe, or at any rate our best current understanding of them.

I am closing this thread based on the declared subject matter being off topic.
 
I would like to know the validity of the following criticism of one of Zeilinger's latest papers https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.07756 "violation of bell inequality with unentangled photons" The review is by Francis Villatoro, in Spanish, https://francis.naukas.com/2025/07/26/sin-entrelazamiento-no-se-pueden-incumplir-las-desigualdades-de-bell/ I will translate and summarize the criticism as follows: -It is true that a Bell inequality is violated, but not a CHSH inequality. The...
I understand that the world of interpretations of quantum mechanics is very complex, as experimental data hasn't completely falsified the main deterministic interpretations (such as Everett), vs non-deterministc ones, however, I read in online sources that Objective Collapse theories are being increasingly challenged. Does this mean that deterministic interpretations are more likely to be true? I always understood that the "collapse" or "measurement problem" was how we phrased the fact that...
This is not, strictly speaking, a discussion of interpretations per se. We often see discussions based on QM as it was understood during the early days and the famous Einstein-Bohr debates. The problem with this is that things in QM have advanced tremendously since then, and the 'weirdness' that puzzles those attempting to understand QM has changed. I recently came across a synopsis of these advances, allowing those interested in interpretational issues to understand the modern view...
Back
Top