How Can You Build a 3V Battery Indicator Without a Zener Diode?

  • Thread starter Thread starter theloathedone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Battery Circuit
AI Thread Summary
To build a 3V battery indicator without a Zener diode, one can use standard diodes in series to achieve the necessary voltage drop. The discussion highlights that using three normal diodes can provide a total drop of about 2.1V, allowing for a sufficient voltage difference between the base and emitter of a transistor. This setup ensures that the voltage difference increases as the battery discharges, providing accurate battery status. The original concern about the limitations of using a Zener diode is addressed by this alternative approach. Overall, the method proposed offers a practical solution for creating a battery indicator circuit.
theloathedone
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this, but here goes.

I'm trying to build a battery indicator circuit for 2 AA batteries (3V). So far what I've read online is that I'd need to use a Zener diode to get a fixed voltage drop, then connect it to a transistor, like the diagram here:
http://www.4qdtec.com/batty.html"

Only problem is, the smallest Zener diode is 2.4V, so the difference between the base and the emitter would be very small - 0.6 V - even when the battery is fully charged.

Will this work?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you don't get help here, try the Electrical Engineering forum. They should be able to help you there.
 
Are you looking at this schematic?

blow.gif


Typical diodes have a 0.6-0.7 V drop when forward biased, so you could use a few of those in series.
 
Yup I'm looking at that schematic, which is for a 6V battery.

Thanks Sciurus, I didn't think of that even though I have a few diodes lying around. So I guess instead of a Zener diode in reverse bias, I could just use (say 3) normal diodes in forward bias to get a 2.1V voltage drop, so the voltage difference between the base and the emitter is around 0.9 V when the battery is fully charged, and decreases as the battery is drained?
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top