Archived How Can You Calculate the Wavelength in a Double Slit Experiment?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the wavelength in a double slit experiment, the relevant equations involve the distances between maxima and the slit separation. Given the angle to the eighth maximum, the distance from the slits to the screen, and the distance between slits, the wavelength can be derived. By using the provided data, specifically the distance between the fifth and first minima, the wavelength is calculated to be 610 nm. Additionally, using the angle to the eighth maximum also confirms the wavelength as 610 nm. This demonstrates that both methods yield consistent results for the wavelength.
quicksilver123
Messages
173
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The following data was obtained via the double slit experiment:

angle to the eighth maximum = 1.12 degrees
distance from slits to screen = 302cm = 3.02m
distance from first to fifth mimum = 2.95cm
distance between slits = 0.00025m

find the wavelength.

Homework Equations



supposed to use this equation to find wavelength:

xn/L=(n-0.5)(\lambda/d)
or
xm/L=(m)(\lambda/d)

The Attempt at a Solution



problem is, there's no given value for xm or xn

how can i get this value?

(oh, and i specifically have to use the equation listed above)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
##x_m## is the distance off axis of the mth maximum, numbering the central bright spot as ##m=0##. You can immediately write the distance between the Mth and mth maxima as ##x_M-x_m=(M-m)L\lambda/d##. A little manipulation gets you ##\lambda=d (x_M-x_m)/L (M-m)##. You provided the distance between the M=5 and m=1 maxima. Plugging that and your other data in gets you ##\lambda=610##nm.

You also gave the angle to the 8th maximum, which tells us that the distance from the axis to the 8th maximum is 3.02 sin(1.12)=0.059m. Plugging that in with M=8, m=0 also yields 610nm.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top