How Can You Choose Just One Area of Physics to Focus On?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thatwentwell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Love Physics
AI Thread Summary
Choosing a single area of physics to focus on can be challenging due to the vastness of topics like vacuum moduli spaces, black holes, and superconductors. Many scientists fall on a spectrum between depth and broadness in their studies, with those leaning towards broad knowledge facing difficulties in academia, where depth is often required. Graduate school is seen as the time to specialize, while undergraduate studies should emphasize a broad education in physics. The passion for multiple topics can lead to feelings of being overwhelmed and a lack of time to explore them all. Ultimately, balancing broad interests with the need for depth is crucial for success in the field.
thatwentwell
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I don't know how else to express it. Vacuum moduli spaces, supernovae, the hodge star formulation of Maxwell's equations, black holes, SU(N) gauge theories, QED, ARPES, superconductors.

I fricking love it all so much and I want to learn it all but I feel like I have no time to learn anything.

How can I focus on just one thing when there so many vast areas of things to learn? What made you fall deeply in love with one topic over another related one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yup, welcome to STEM, where there is so much cool stuff that it's hard to pick one.

There is an entire spectrum of scientists out there. One way to distinguish scientists is the "depth-broadness" scale. That is: some scientists will prefer to dig deep in one small topic, other will try to learn a lot of topics. This is not a black-white scale of course, but people fall somewhere in this spectrum.

Myself, I lean heavily towards the "broadness" part of the spectrum. I like to learn about all kind of different, but neat stuff. I have noticed though that this caused me significant problems. A researcher in university is expected to gain depth in a special topic and to make new advances there. Some level of broadness is required, but too much broadness really harms a researcher. So if you prefer a broad knowledge over a deep one, then be prepared to have a tough time in academia.
 
  • Like
Likes Thewindyfan
thatwentwell said:
I don't know how else to express it. Vacuum moduli spaces, supernovae, the hodge star formulation of Maxwell's equations, black holes, SU(N) gauge theories, QED, ARPES, superconductors.

I fricking love it all so much and I want to learn it all but I feel like I have no time to learn anything.

How can I focus on just one thing when there so many vast areas of things to learn? What made you fall deeply in love with one topic over another related one?

That's what graduate school is for. For right now, focus on getting a broad education in physics during undergraduate.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top