How Can You Determine Point-Rotational Symmetry of a General Function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Unit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Symmetry
Unit
Messages
181
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given f(x), find an expression to check whether f(x) has rotational symmetry about any arbitrary point (h, v).

Homework Equations


If f(x) = f(-x) then the function is symmetrical about the y-axis.

If f(x) = -f(-x) then the function is point-rotational about the origin.

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know how to deal with "general" functions, so I did this:

Let f(x) = x^3 + v because I know it has this symmetry.
f(-x) = (-x)^3 + v
f(-x) = -x^3 + v
-f(-x) = x^3 - v

Then I found the difference between f(x) and -f(-x).

f(x) - (-f(-x)) = (x^3 + v) - (x^3 - v)
f(x) + f(-x) = 2v
f(x) = -f(-x) + 2v

This gives me point-rotation about (0, v). But how do I do this for just a "general" function?

Also, I can guess that point-rotation about (h, 0) will be something like f(x) = -f(-x+2h), based on knowledge of transformations, but how do I show this as elegantly as above with (0, v)?

From this, I can guess that if f(x) = -f(-x+2h)+2v for a real point (h, v), then the function's graph is point-rotational about (h, v). Is this correct?

Cheers,
Unit

p.s. I made this problem up for myself, if that's okay.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't mean "general function" you mean "general point".

Given a point (u, v) in the xy-plane, you can "translate" (u, v) to (0, 0) by subtracting u from x and v from y. f(x) becomes f(x- u) and y= f(x) becomes y- v= f(x- u) or, finally, y= f(x- u)+ v. Now, what happens if you replace x with -x?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top