B How can you do e.g. 756 x 675 mentally?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter cyentist
  • Start date Start date
cyentist
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
Hello!

How can you do e.g. 756 x 675 mentally?

Any good trick?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
cyentist said:
Hello!

How can you do e.g. 756 x 675 mentally?

Any good trick?

To do that, you need a very good short-term memory to not lose track of what you're doing.

Something like ##999\cdot 999## is simpler because then

##(1000-1)^2 = 1000^2 + 2\cdot 1000 \cdot (-1) + (-1)^2 = 998001##

and the numbers here are "special" enough to easily keep track of.
 
Vedic math might have some tricks to allow you to do this too but I think the Trachtenberg method is the best mentally.

https://vedicmathsindia.org/vedic-mathematics/?v=7516fd43adaa

I need to say that Vedic math is not without controversy as the name is a misnomer (ie not from the Vedic period but from a 1965 book on the subject) and its more a collection of arithmetic tricks and not math perse.

As a kid, when I was asked to do this kind of calculation by a friend, I'd ask him why he needed the answer and while he was responding, work it out mentally and then answer. It gave me a few moments but people thought my answer came out instantaneously which was okay by me.
 
hilbert2 said:
and the numbers here are "special" enough to easily keep track of.
756*675 luckily has special enough numbers. 4*675=2700, and 756 happens to be divisible by 4. So simplifies to 189*27.
And 189 is 200-11. 11*27 is nicely 297. So 5400-297=5103. The answer is 510300.
 
This may not always work, but does in some cases: first, use the trick for squaring : ##a^2=a^2-b^2+b^2##. Seems tautological but then factor as ##a^2=(a-b)(a+b)+b^2##. So , e.g., ##988^2=(988+12)(988-12)+12^2=(1000)(976)+144=976144##. Now, if you have either two events or two odds, e.g., if you had 756*676,you can find the average and apply the trick: 756*676= (716+40)(716-40)=##716^2-40^2##. And ##40^2=1600## and you find a convenient number to help you square 716. So this works out well with some pairs of numbers. I hope I wrote this clearly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top