How Can You Modify an Equation to Favor a Specific Variable Value?

  • Thread starter Thread starter clydas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Specific
clydas
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Suppose I have the following equation:
P=a*n
Where a is a value between 0 and 1.
n is the day of the week. (this is just an example)

How do I change this expression so, for example, if one were to put 5 for n, the result would be marginally greater than those resulting from inserting any other number (1,2,3,4,6,7)?
Common sense dictates putting in (n/5), but that does not work if one inputs 6 or 7 into the equation.

Enlightenment on the area of math that such processes deal with would be great help as well.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi clydas! :smile:

I'm not sure what you want to do with this, so I don't know if you will like the answer.

The trick is to change n with a function that takes a maximum in 5. For example

P=a*(-(n-5)^2)

Or

P=a*(-(n-5)^2+100)

Or even

P=a*e^{-(n-5)^2}
 
micromass said:
Hi clydas! :smile:

I'm not sure what you want to do with this, so I don't know if you will like the answer.

The trick is to change n with a function that takes a maximum in 5. For example

P=a*(-(n-5)^2)

Or

P=a*(-(n-5)^2+100)

Or even

P=a*e^{-(n-5)^2}

Ah, now it seems obvious.

Thank you very much! Your answer is perfect!
Just for the record: I'm not that slow in math as it might appear, it's just that sometimes the most obvious of things are the least noticeable.

Thanks again!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top