How Can You Parametrize Elements of SL(2,C) with Fewer Unknowns?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cristo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Element General
cristo
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Messages
8,144
Reaction score
75
I'm halfway through a question on a past differential geometry exam, and suddenly in comes a matrix g a member of SL(2,C) (where C denotes the complex numbers)

Now, I can't remember how to express a general element of this group: I know the matrix must be

\left(\begin{array}{cc}a&b\\c&d\end{array}\right) such that ad-bc=1, but can this be expressed in a more precise way in the complex case (i.e. with fewer than four unknowns, maybe by utilising the complex conjugate)?

I've tried looking on the internet, but to no avail. I would really appreciate someone helping, since I could do with getting on with the question!

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you have is the simplest possiblity of parametrizing an arbitrary element of Sl(2,C). To see that, answer the questions below:

1.How many parameter does SL(2,C) have ?
2.How many does the matrix assume?
3.How many does the ad-bc=1 condition fix?

As for other parametrizations of SL(2,C), search for the "polar decomposition theorem for SL(2,C)". Also for the "Cayley-Klein parametrization of SL(2,C)".
Daniel.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top