How Can You Solve a Linear Kinematics Problem Involving Two Accelerating Cars?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a linear kinematics problem involving two cars accelerating towards an intersection. Car A accelerates from rest at 0.5 m/s² for 20 seconds, while Car B starts 5 seconds later with an acceleration of 0.7 m/s² and is initially 20 meters further away. Participants share their methods for calculating the time when both cars are equidistant from the intersection, with one suggesting the use of distance equations to form a quadratic equation for solutions. The calculations yield different results, prompting questions about the accuracy and efficiency of the approaches used. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between distance, acceleration, and time in solving such problems.
andysmax
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two cars are at the start lines of two roads at right angles to each other and pointing to the intersection 500 metres away. Car A starts from rest with uniform accelereation of 0.5m/s2 and accelerates for 20 seconds. It then continues at the speed reached. Car B starts 5 seconds later and 20 metres further away with an acceleration of 0.7m/s2.
Calculate wrt the start time of Car A:

a) Time taken for B and A to be the same distance from the cross-road.

b) The distance from the cross roads at the above time

c) The average velocity of Car A at this distance.

Homework Equations



v=u+at
v2=u2+2as

The Attempt at a Solution



First i used v=u+at and plugged the results into a table showing velocity against time for car A and B, for upto 60 seconds at ten second intervals.
Then i transposed the second equation for s to work out the distance s=v2-u2/2a for car a and s=(v2-u2/2a)-20 for car B.
This was then plugged into a second table showing distance against time.
From this table it was deduced that the area of interest was between 50 and 60 seconds.
I carried on with this process until i narrowed it down.
The answer i got for a) was 57.67 seconds.
b) was just working the time back through the previous equations which gave 23.3m (500-476.7).
c) i calculated change in distance over change in time: 476.7/57.67 = 8.267m/s2

However, this was time consuming and i am wondering if there was a simpler way to tackle this(if indeed the above solution is correct!), possibly as a simultaneous equation?

Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rest assured that you don't need to use tables for any physics problem. When the two cars are at the same distance from the cross-road, two things are the same for both cars: distance traveled and time taken. Which equation relates distance, acceleration, and time? Start there.
 
Your method looks pretty good. I did it a different way and got a different answer! Kind of complicated and easy to make a little mistake, which I have a habit of doing.
For car A I did the first 20 seconds as v = at = .5*20 = 10
d = .5*a*t^2 = 100 m
Then for times larger than 20 we have d = 100 + vt = 100+10(t-20)

For car B, d = do + vi*t + .5*a*t^2
d = -20 +.5*.7*(t-5)^2

for (a) I set the two distance equations equal, collected like terms and got this quadratic: .35*t^2 - 13.5*t + 88.75 = 0
It has two solutions, one less than 20 so no good, and t = 30.17 s
I checked the distances at that time and they are equal (if my equations are correct!).
 
ideasrule said:
Rest assured that you don't need to use tables for any physics problem. When the two cars are at the same distance from the cross-road, two things are the same for both cars: distance traveled and time taken. Which equation relates distance, acceleration, and time? Start there.

Car B starts 20 m further away. That's why i went the table route.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top