How Can You Solve the Geometric Series Expansion for \(\sum n^2 x^n\)?

AI Thread Summary
To solve the geometric series expansion for \(\sum n^2 x^n\), one approach involves using the operator \(x\frac{d}{dx}\) to relate it to known series. The formula \(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} n^2 x^n\) can be derived by applying this operator twice to the basic geometric series \(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} x^n\). For finite series, the discussion suggests exploring the Calculus of Finite Differences, as there are limited resources for comprehensive tables of finite summations. The focus remains on finding closed forms for infinite series, with a recommendation to search for "polynomial geometric series" for further insights. This method provides a pathway to understanding and calculating the desired series expansion.
Andronicus1717
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
I need to find the solution to the geometric series expansion of the form...

\sumn^2*x^n , for n=0,1,2,...

most resources I've found only have answers for n*x^n or n*x^(n-1). I have no idea how to calculate this, so I was wondering if there's a book out there that has massive lists of geometric series or is there method for easily calculating this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A common way to try to find closed forms for series like these is to try to relate them to a series you already know. For example, note that

n^2 x^n = \left(x\frac{d}{dx}\right)^2 x^n.

So,

\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} n^2 x^n = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\left(x\frac{d}{dx}\right)^2 x^n = \left(x\frac{d}{dx}\right)^2 \sum_{n=0}^\infty x^n.

(Swapping the sum and derivative isn't always allowed, but in this case it should be ok).

In case you're not sure,

\left(x\frac{d}{dx}\right)^2f(x) = x\frac{d}{dx}\left(x\frac{df}{dx}\right).
 
Andronicus1717,

Do you want to sum infinite series or finite series? I don't know of any reference book that gives a large table of finite summations. (I wonder why there aren't several such books.)

If you want to know the method for doing finite summations in closed form, the field you should look up is The Calculus of Finite Differences.

I think this web page talks about the type of sums you are asking about. http://2000clicks.com/MathHelp/SeriesPolynomialGeometric.aspx

You might find more information by searching for "polynomial geometric series".
 
Thank you, your responses have been very helpful!

Stephen Tashi: The infinite series is what I was looking for. Next time I will try and better use the equation syntax.
 
most resources I've found only have answers for n*x^n or n*x^(n-1)

By the way, have you considered multiplying the latter by x, and then differentiating again?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top