How can you tell if the interaction is isotropic?

FalconKICK
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A teenager has a car that accelerates at 3.00 m/s2 and decelerates at -4.50 m/s2. On a trip to the store, he accelerates from rest to 16.5 m/s, drives at a constant speed for 5.00 s, and then comes to a momentary stop at the corner. He then accelerates to 18.0 m/s, drives at a constant speed for 15.0 s, and decelerates for 2.67 s. Then he continues for 4.00 s at this speed and comes to a stop.


Homework Equations


(a) How long does the trip take?
(b) How far has he traveled?
(c) What is his average speed for the trip?
(d) How long would it take to walk to the store and back if he walks at 1.50 m/s?


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know which equations and what numbers to use. Any help on how I can find out which numbers are the ones I need and which equation I should use?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Get some graph paper and draw a diagram.
Put time along the bottom and speed up the side.
The area under the graph is the distance.

Then when you understand it you can use s=ut + 1/2 at^2 to solve each section.
 
mgb_phys said:
Get some graph paper and draw a diagram.
Put time along the bottom and speed up the side.
The area under the graph is the distance.

Then when you understand it you can use s=ut + 1/2 at^2 to solve each section.

I've actually done that but I'm still confused.
 
You should be able to easily plot the speed at each point in time - it's just a series of straight lines.

A teenager has a car that accelerates at 3.00 m/s2 and decelerates at -4.50 m/s2.
So we assume all accel is 3m/s^2 and all braking is -4.5m/s^2 (actually if you are going to say deceleration and have a negative vallue that cancels out and implies aceleration ...)

he accelerates from rest to 16.5 m/s,
Use v = u + a t with 3.0 m/s^2 to get 't'


drives at a constant speed for 5.00 s,
Easy

and then comes to a momentary stop at the corner.
Use v=u + a t again with -4.5m/s^2

He then accelerates to 18.0 m/s
Use v = u + a t with 3.0 m/s^2 to get 't'

drives at a constant speed for 15.0 s,
Easy

and decelerates for 2.67 s.
Use v=u + a t again with -4.5m/s^2

Then he continues for 4.00 s at this speed
Easy

and comes to a stop.
Use v=u + a t again with -4.5m/s^2

Then the time you can just read of the axis.
The distance is the integral (ie the area under the curve)
And the average speed is just distance/time
 
Is it the same thing as finding the X and Y components? If not I'm confused. I was never really good at physics anyways.
 
I got the time the trip takes. All I really need now is how far he traveled, but I am having trouble figuring out how to get this. Any help?

Edit: I solved it :D
 
Last edited:
##|\Psi|^2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\exp(\frac{-(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##\braket{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,x\exp(-\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##y=x-x_0 \quad x=y+x_0 \quad dy=dx.## The boundaries remain infinite, I believe. ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dy(y+x_0)\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2}).## ##\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,y\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2})+\frac{2x_0}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,\exp(-\frac{y^2}{b^2}).## I then resolved the two...
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
It's given a gas of particles all identical which has T fixed and spin S. Let's ##g(\epsilon)## the density of orbital states and ##g(\epsilon) = g_0## for ##\forall \epsilon \in [\epsilon_0, \epsilon_1]##, zero otherwise. How to compute the number of accessible quantum states of one particle? This is my attempt, and I suspect that is not good. Let S=0 and then bosons in a system. Simply, if we have the density of orbitals we have to integrate ##g(\epsilon)## and we have...
Back
Top