How Close Must a Charged Pen Be to Pick Up Aluminium Foil?

  • Thread starter Thread starter luckyducky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aluminium Charged
luckyducky
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A clear plastic pen of length 14.5 cm is rubbed with wool. The charged plastic pen is held over a small uncharged disk shaped piece of aluminium foil of diameter 0.5cm. How close you must move the pen to the foil in order to pick up the foil?



The Attempt at a Solution



Ok I thought I would let the disk be a diople and let the pen be a point charge but nothing worked. Please explain to me how I should do this question.

Thank you very much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You migth want to study the forum rules. You MUST attempt the problem, and tells us what relations and formulas you know.
 
This is what I did?

Ok this is what I did but don't know whether it is right or not:
E = 1/(4 pi epslon) * Q/d^2 is the electric field of the pen

I said that the aluminium foil works like a capacitor therefore:
(qA)/epsilon - 1/(4 pi epslon) * Q/d^2 = 0 also Q=10 nanoC the charge of the pen

then I can figure out the charge of the foil on one side I think(I hope this is right)

Electricfield of disk = ((Q/A)*(s/R))/2epsilon where s=thickness of the disk
also m=dV is the formula for density, but is V= pi r^2 s
then if the above is right we know F = mg
F = ((Q/A)*(s/R))/2epsilon m = D pi r^2 s
therefore:
((Q/A)*(s/R))/2epsilon = D pi r^2 s g

But is this even right, I really need you guys to help me please HELP me !
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top