How come a bouncing ball does not exhibit SHM characteristics?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the characteristics of simple harmonic motion (SHM) and why a bouncing ball does not exhibit these characteristics. Participants explore the role of forces, particularly contact forces, in the context of SHM.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the defining characteristics of SHM and whether they apply to a bouncing ball. There is exploration of the role of restoring forces and the nature of contact forces during the ball's bounce.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the nature of forces involved in the bouncing ball scenario. Some suggest that the absence of a restoring force is fundamental to understanding why the motion does not qualify as SHM. Others are examining the implications of elastic collisions and the time intervals of the ball's bounces.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of hypothetical scenarios regarding elastic collisions and the potential energy dynamics involved, which may influence the understanding of SHM in this context.

.NoStyle
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How come a bouncing ball does not exhibit SHM characteristics?


Homework Equations


no clue



The Attempt at a Solution



When I think of SHM, I don't think of contact forces. In the bouncing call case, there is a contact force present when the ball hits the ground.

Would the graph for a bouncing ball look curved as it approached it's height, but then a sharp V as it hits the ground?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the defining characteristic of a system in SHM? Does this apply to a bouncing ball?
 
Think of it this way...

As the ball bounces, why do the time intervals that the ball is in the air get smaller the longer the ball bounces... it is missing a certain force that is essential to SHM...
 
The fact that the ball is airborne for shorter periods of times after each consecutive bounce is not the reason why it doesn't count as SHM. One can envisage a hypothetical scenario where the collision of the ball with the floor is entirely elastic; no kinetic energy is lost to the floor as heat, sound etc. There is something more fundamental in the definition of SHM than that consideration.
 
Defennder said:
The fact that the ball is airborne for shorter periods of times after each consecutive bounce is not the reason why it doesn't count as SHM. One can envisage a hypothetical scenario where the collision of the ball with the floor is entirely elastic; no kinetic energy is lost to the floor as heat, sound etc. There is something more fundamental in the definition of SHM than that consideration.

maybe were on a different wavelength here, but i was hinting at... its not SHM because it has no restoring force... aka... why the ball doesn't return to its original position. I wasnt saying that's why it isn't SHM, i was using that as an example as to aid him in finding the answer.
 
.NoStyle said:

Homework Statement


How come a bouncing ball does not exhibit SHM characteristics?

Homework Equations


no clue

The Attempt at a Solution



When I think of SHM, I don't think of contact forces. In the bouncing call case, there is a contact force present when the ball hits the ground.

Would the graph for a bouncing ball look curved as it approached it's height, but then a sharp V as it hits the ground?

(By the way, a bouncing ball that is in motion in another direction exhibits what you describe with the sharp V at the impulse of the floor changing direction.

Thanks
From Wikipedia:
"In words, simple harmonic motion is "motion where the force acting on a body and thereby acceleration of the body is proportional to, and opposite in direction to the displacement from its equilibrium position" (i.e. F = − kx)."

Your instinct looks correct. The contact with the floor is an impulse force that perturbs the constant accelerated motion that it is otherwise subjected to in one direction of gravity only.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K