How come the three layers of retina are so awkwardly arranged?

  • Thread starter Thread starter garytse86
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The arrangement of the three layers of the retina, where light must pass through inner and intermediate layers before reaching the photoreceptor layer, is primarily viewed as an evolutionary artifact rather than an advantage. The structure evolved from simpler photoreceptors, similar to the concept of the blind spot. The light-sensitive cells, rods and cones, contain membranous discs with photo-pigments that initiate light response, requiring regular replacement every ten days. The outer layer, known as the pigment epithelium, is essential for recycling these discs and regenerating photo-pigments after exposure to light. However, since the pigment epithelium is opaque and cannot allow light to pass, it must be positioned outside the photoreceptors, necessitating the current arrangement of the retinal layers.
garytse86
Messages
311
Reaction score
0
How come the three layers of retina are so awkwardly arranged?
Light has to pass through the inner and intermediate layers before reaching the photoreceptor layer, was there any evolutionary advantage by having this arrangement?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I'm not an expert, but I believe it is just an artifact of the evolution of the eye from simple photoreceptors, and not an evolutionary advantage per se. Sort of like the blind spot.
 
The light sensitive cells (rods and cones) contain membranous discs that contain the light-sensitive photo-pigments and other chemicals that start the response to the incoming light. These discs have to be replaced after some time (in about ten days most of them have been replaced by new ones). The outer layer of the eye, called the pigment epithelium, plays a crucial role in removing those discs and recycling the parts thereof. It also has the chemical machineries that help to regenerate the photo-pigments after they have been exposed to light (the pigments must be transformed back to a shape in which they can respond to light again). Because of this, the light sensitive cells have to be close to this epithelium. However, the pigment epithelium is opaque and does not let light pass so it cannot be on the inside of the eye and therefore has to be on the outside (with the rods and cones as the first layer next to them).
 
Last edited:
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...

Similar threads

Back
Top