How correct is deriving Coulomb's Law from Gauss's Law

AI Thread Summary
Deriving Coulomb's Law from Gauss's Law involves using a Gaussian sphere to calculate the electric field. By applying Gauss's Law, the surface integral leads to the equation (4πr²)E = q/ε, allowing for the calculation of the electric field E. The derivation is considered valid and is a straightforward method to find the electric field of a point charge. Concerns about rigor in the course material are acknowledged, but the logic of the derivation is sound. Overall, the approach effectively demonstrates the relationship between the two laws.
Steenrod
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
How correct is "deriving" Coulomb's Law from Gauss's Law

Homework Statement


Here is a question that appeared in my school question paper: "Derive Coulomb's Law from Gauss's Law."

2. The attempt at a solution

I tried the following:
Consider a Gaussian Sphere or radius $r$

By Gass's law,the surface integral ∫E.dA=q/ε implies (4pi r^2) E =q/ε. Solving for E, we get an expression for E which looks like Gauss's law. However, I feel something is not right here.I would appreciate of someone please told me where I am going wrong.
(My course is not rigorous so I apologise in advance for lack of knowledge)
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Your logic is fine. This is the easy way to derive the electric field of a point charge.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top