How Deep Does the Fish Appear in the Tank Mirror?

  • Thread starter Thread starter asd1249jf
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the apparent depth of a fish in a tank with a mirrored bottom, filled with water to a depth of 21.0 cm, with the fish located 6.80 cm below the water surface. The index of refraction for water is given as 1.33, while air is 1. The initial attempt at solving the problem involved using a spherical optics equation, but the user encountered confusion regarding the negative distance obtained, which is not physically meaningful. The key point is that light rays from the fish are refracted as they exit the water, leading to an apparent depth that needs to be calculated. Clarification on the correct approach to determine this apparent depth is sought.
asd1249jf

Homework Statement


A tank whose bottom is a mirror is filled with water to a depth of 21.0cm. A small fish floats motionless 6.80cm under the surface of the water. Use index of refraction 1.33 for water and 1 for air.


Homework Equations


What is the apparent depth of the reflection of the fish in the bottom of the tank when viewed at normal incidence?


The Attempt at a Solution



First of all, I don't think I understand the question properly. Really, I think this is the most retardedly (Excuse me for the language) worded question ever.

I tried to solve it anyhow. Here's what I did :

Generally, for a spherical-relationship optic equation is

(n_a/s_a) + (n_b / s_b) = [(n_b) - (n_a)] / R

In this case, the fish tank's bottom surface is flat. So R (Radius of curvature) = infinity, which makes the second part 0.

So plugging in the values

(1.33 / 21.0 - 6.8) + (1 / s_b) = 0

and solving for s_b gives -10.67, but we cannot have negative distance, therefore, the answer is 10.67cm which is completely wrong.

can anyone help me what I did wrong in the steps?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can someone please... help...
 
Rays of light from a point on the fish (not a ray traveling vertically upwards) will be refracted away from the normal when it exits into the air. This means that a person who looks at these rays will conclude that they originated from a point higher up in the water than where they actually came from.

You need to determine the depth of this "apparent" point as viewed by such a person.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top