How Did Chemists of the Past Measure Elements for the Periodic Table

  • Thread starter Thread starter scientifico
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry
AI Thread Summary
Chemists of the past determined the weights of elements to construct the periodic table primarily through the use of quality balances and a significant amount of guesswork. They often misclassified composite substances as elements until further evidence disproved this. To compare atomic weights, they relied on the concept of equivalent masses, which are relative and do not require knowing the exact number of particles in a mole. The ratio of equivalent weights can be established through chemical reactions, such as determining how much iron reacts with sulfur. John Dalton was pivotal in proposing a system of atomic weights, although his and subsequent weights were not always accurate. Additionally, methods like freezing point depression and boiling point elevation of solutions provided insights into the quantities of moles, further aiding in the understanding of atomic weights without modern lab techniques. The discussion highlights the gradual evolution of these concepts and the importance of studying mass proportions in compounds.
scientifico
Messages
181
Reaction score
0
Hello, how did chemists of the past know the weight of the elements to build up the periodic table without using new lab tecniques ?
Have they transformed all the elements into gases and used Avogadro's law to obtain a relative atomic mass ? And how did they it was an element and not a compost ?

Thank you
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
They used quality balances to measure weight, and a lot of guesswork.

Some composite substances were considered elements till they were proved to be not.
 
Borek said:
They used quality balances to measure weight, and a lot of guesswork.
Yes but to compare atomic weight of two elements you must be sure you have the same number of particles in both elements, how did they solved this ?
 
What exactly do you mean with "whithout using new lab techniques"?
 
withou the possibility to calculate the number of particles in a mole
 
You don't need that, equivalent masses are relative.
 
Borek said:
You don't need that, equivalent masses are relative.
What do you mean?
If I take 1 g of Fe and 1g of S I can't calculate relative atomic weight because they don't contains the same quantity of atoms...
 
Dalton was the first to propose and publish a system of atomic weights.

Google "Dalton atomic weights" finds lots.

However he was right about some and wrong about other weights, as were those who followed immediately.

The story of how the correct values gradually unfolded is quite fascinating and well presented in the book

"Chasing the Molecule" by Julian Buckingham
 
  • #10
You don't need to have vapours. You can also infer the amount of moles e.g. from freezing point depression of solutions of salts, boiling point increase etc.
As others pointed out before, a lot can be learned from studying the mass proportions in different compounds.
 
  • #11
DrDu said:
You can also infer the amount of moles e.g. from freezing point depression of solutions of salts, boiling point increase etc.
What are that ?
 
  • #12
scientifico said:
What are that ?

Have you tried to google them or do you expect to be spoon feed all the time?
 
Back
Top