How Did Feynman Determine Specific Arrow Sizes and Angles in QED?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BiBi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Turning
AI Thread Summary
Feynman determines specific arrow sizes and angles in QED through the principles of complex arithmetic, which he simplifies by referring to amplitudes as "little arrows." The lengths of these arrows represent probabilities, and their angles correspond to phase information. When multiplying two complex numbers, the resulting arrow's length is the product of the original lengths, while the angle is the sum of the original angles. This results in a shorter product since the initial lengths are less than one. The discussion highlights the mathematical foundation behind Feynman's visual representation of quantum mechanics, emphasizing the relationship between complex numbers and the behavior of photons.
BiBi
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
In Richard Feynman's book QED, when writing about multiplying arrows of photons (on page 61 if you have the book handy)he shrinks and turns them at specific numbers, and though I understand why and how it's effective, I don't understand how he determined to shrink and turn the arrows by those specific amounts. If anyone knows, when shrinking and turning arrows, how you come up with those amounts and numbers I would be grateful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The shrinking and turning of the arrows is a feature of the complex arithmetic that Feynman didn't want to get into, which is why he chose to speak of the amplitudes as "little arrows" rather than complex numbers. If you have two complex numbers they can be written u cos \theta + iu sin \theta and v cos \phi + iv sin \phi, where u and v give the lengths and the angles are the ones the two vectors make with the real axis.
If you multiply them you get after simplification uv cos(\theta + \phi) + iuv sin (\theta + \phi). So the product has length equal to the products of the two factors and its angle is the sum of theirs. Since the lengths were less than 1 to begin with, the product uv is smaller still, therefore the product is shorter than the factors. And the sum of the angles gives the rotation.
 
thank you so much! I've been asking my friends for almost a week now, but no one had done QED for a while, if at all. thanks again.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top