How Did Planets Enter Their Orbits?

AI Thread Summary
After the Big Bang, planets formed from dust and gas that coalesced into spinning, contracting disks due to gravitational forces. These disks shrank and sped up their rotation, leading to the formation of a central star surrounded by a protoplanetary disk. Clumps within this disk eventually became planets, which continued to gather remaining material until a stable system of a star and planets emerged. The mass of each planet influenced its orbital location in relation to the sun and other planets. Gravity played a crucial role throughout this process, guiding the formation and positioning of celestial bodies.
ajassat
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
This is something I thought about while drifting off to bed last night.

Immediately after the period between the big bang and the formation of planets, how did these newly created planets enter their respective orbits.

I'm assuming the planets had different masses and that this was a major factor in deciding the location of the orbit in relation to the sun and other planets

Can somebody shed more light on this?
 
Space news on Phys.org
No. The dust and gas that settled out of the BB coalesced into spinning, contracting disks. These disks shrank under gravity, causing their rotation to speed up. Eventually the centre formed a star with a disk. The disk started clumping and these clumps became planets. The planets swept up the remaining dust and gas until there was just a star and a bunch of planets in various orbits.
 
Thank you for pointing me in the right direction.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top