Tumorsito
- 9
- 0
So the question is pretty simple, how did he came up with the wave function and why does the Schrödinger eq model / predict the change of the wave function throw time?
vanhees71 said:Well, are the problems with the "non-local" operator in the 2nd box discussed in this paper? I don't click on research gate links anymore.
I guess I'm not as 'seasoned' as you are in that regard ##-## the paper doesn't discuss 'Schrödinger steering', but it does make brief reference to the fact that the photon doesn't exhibit the locality that is characterizable with Schrödinger's ('(##v<<c##)-bounded' approximation) equation.vanhees71 said:Well, are the problems with the "non-local" operator in the 2nd box discussed in this paper? I don't click on research gate links anymore.
In my experience, such papers are either trivial or wrong or both. And they never use units ##c=1## or ##\hbar=1##. And usually work with ##h## and ##\nu## rather than ##\hbar## and ##\omega##.vanhees71 said:It's a theory paper typed in MS Word though![]()
Demystifier said:In my experience, such papers are either trivial or wrong or both. And they never use units ##c=1## or ##\hbar=1##. And usually work with ##h## and ##\nu## rather than ##\hbar## and ##\omega##.
I summarized the basic argument from that paper in a long-ago post:Isaac0427 said: