B How did this Black Hole come to exist?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole
AI Thread Summary
Astronomers have discovered the most distant supermassive black hole, located in an ultrabright quasar that emitted light just 690 million years after the Big Bang. This light has taken approximately 13 billion years to reach Earth, raising questions about the universe's age. Some participants speculate that the observed redshift might not solely be cosmological, suggesting potential errors in distance calculations. Concerns are raised about the black hole's formation during the reionization epoch, which could imply inconsistencies in our understanding of the universe's timeline. The discussion indicates a need for further investigation into the implications of these findings.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/12/171206131946.htm

A team of astronomers, including two from MIT, has detected the most distant supermassive black hole ever observed. The black hole sits in the center of an ultrabright quasar, the light of which was emitted just 690 million years after the Big Bang. That light has taken about 13 billion years to reach us -- a span of time that is nearly equal to the age of the universe.

May be the universe is older than we think?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
wolram said:
That light has taken about 13 billion years to reach us
I wonder whether the red shift observed and used to calculate distance might be in part due to the emitted photons coming from close to the event horizon, and it is not entirely a cosmological red shift.
 
Buzz Bloom said:
I wonder whether the red shift observed and used to calculate distance might be in part due to the emitted photons coming from close to the event horizon, and it is not entirely a cosmological red shift.

I'm not sure but if this Black Hole formed during re ionisation some thing must be wrong, either the observation has errors or the age of the universe must be wrong.
 
wolram said:
I'm not sure but if this Black Hole formed during re ionisation some thing must be wrong, either the observation has errors or the age of the universe must be wrong.

How so? How does this contradict the age of the universe?
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top