How Do 38W and 92W Peltier Cells Compare in Efficiency?

  • Thread starter Thread starter junkfunkydude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cell Peltier
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the efficiency comparison between 38W and 92W Peltier cells, highlighting that both cells share identical dimensions and junction counts, yet the 92W cell only offers a marginal temperature differential (dT) increase of 1 degree Celsius. This raises questions about the accuracy of seller claims regarding performance and material composition, particularly the Seebeck coefficient. Additionally, the conversation touches on the efficiency decline associated with cell size and suggests that utilizing multiple cells may enhance overall performance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Peltier effect and thermoelectric cooling principles
  • Familiarity with Seebeck coefficient and its impact on thermoelectric materials
  • Knowledge of thermal management techniques in electronics
  • Basic concepts of efficiency metrics in thermoelectric devices
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Seebeck coefficient and its role in thermoelectric efficiency
  • Explore the thermal performance of Peltier cells under varying load conditions
  • Investigate the design and implementation of multi-cell thermoelectric systems
  • Learn about advancements in thermoelectric materials and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, hobbyists, and researchers interested in thermoelectric cooling solutions, particularly those comparing Peltier cell efficiencies and exploring innovative thermal management strategies.

junkfunkydude
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A while back, I purchased a 38W peltier cell on ebay. It wasn't powerful enough, so I'm looking at something along the lines of a 92W. I noticed, however that my 38W and the 92W have the same dimensions and the same number of junctions. Also, dT of the 92W is only 1 degree C above the 38W.

How is this possible?
Are the sellers providing false information?
Is one made out of a material with a higher Seebeck coefficient?
If so, will one be more efficient than the other?

Also, a general explanation as to how the different factors effect a cell would be greatly appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I remember reading that there is some falloff of efficiency with size and that using multiple cells is a better way to go.
I got my first chip on a 80286 processor cooler (6 mhz:bugeye: ) and been playing with them ever since. I heard that the 08 Chrysler Sebring is coming out with heated and cooled cup holders...I can bet how they're going to do that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
6K