How do altimeters react in high acceleration flow?

  • Thread starter Thread starter user079622
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Barometric altimeters react to horizontal pressure gradients during missile acceleration, affecting readings even at a constant altitude. The air pressure measured by the altimeter varies based on its position on the missile, with higher pressure at the front and lower at the rear. Proper placement of static ports is crucial to ensure accurate airflow measurements, as disturbances from the airframe can impact readings. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) modeling is employed to enhance accuracy, especially for larger jets, by comparing data from clean air sources against production static ports. Accurate calibration is essential for reliable altimeter performance in high acceleration scenarios.
user079622
Messages
449
Reaction score
29
@boneh3ad
How will barometric altimeter react to horizontal pressure gradient when missile accelerate horizontally, in subsonic regime?
Will he change reading even if he fly at same altitude?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Air pressure which barometric altimeter measures depends on position of the missile surface where altimeter is. Head air pressure is higher than the Tails. Higher altitude air pressure is lower than the lowers.
 
Last edited:
anuttarasammyak said:
Air pressure which barometric altimeter measures depends on position of the missile surface where altimeter is. Head air pressure is higher than the Tails. Higher altitude air pressure is lower than the lowers.
Yes but static ports must be place in position where airflow velocity is same as freestream.

Here is static port at rocket.
1YABh.webp
 
Bit late to the party, but…

Static ports are not perfect. There’s always some disturbance from airflow around the airframe that needs to be accounted for. CFD modeling helps a great deal for that these days, but at least for larger jets, there will usually be a static port run out on a line, often from the tip of the vertical stabilizer, to provide clean air to reference against. The flight test program then compares the “clean” data against the data from the production static ports and then uses that comparison to create a calibration database.

Hopefully this helps.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes berkeman and russ_watters
Venus does not have a magnetosphere, so the Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) environment shall be much worse than in a LEO environment. Looking to the std radiation models for Venus, the standard radiation-hard space level electronic component with tested immunity LET = 85 MeV-cm2/mg seems not enough, so, for example, a 1cm2 Si die will suffer considerable flux above this level during a long mission (10 years for example). So, the question is, usually we are not paying attention to latch-up...
Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/
Thread 'SpaceX Starship development: 7th flight January 10'
Watch the progress live This is a fully stacked Starship (top) and Super Heavy (bottom). A couple of too-small-to-see cars near the bottom for scale, I also added a Saturn V and the Statue of Liberty for comparison. 120 meters tall, about 5000 tonnes when fully fueled. Twice the mass and over twice the thrust of Saturn V. The largest rocket ever built by mass, thrust, height, and payload capacity. N1 had the largest diameter.[/size] But its size is not the revolutionary part. It is designed...
Back
Top