How Do Bullet Impact and Spring Constants Determine Oscillation Characteristics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Biggidy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bullet Spring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the oscillation characteristics of a block-spring system after a bullet collides with the block. The user initially calculates the period as approximately 1.2 seconds and estimates the amplitude as 45 cm. However, feedback indicates a misunderstanding of the collision type, suggesting that momentum conservation should be applied instead of assuming an elastic collision. This correction is crucial for accurately determining the post-collision velocity and subsequent oscillation parameters. The conversation highlights the importance of using the correct physics principles in solving such problems.
Biggidy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

A 4kg block resting on frictionless surface is attached to spring of k=100n/m. A 2g bullet is fired at 100m/s at the block. What is the period and amplitude of oscillations?



2. Homework Equations

1/2mv2 = kinetic energy
1/2kx2 = elastic energy
2 x pi x square root (mass/k) = period

3. The Attempt at a Solution

No answer choices given, just seeing if my thought process is valid.

First, period. 2 x pi x square root (4/100) = 2 x pi x 2/10 = 4pi/10 = approx. 1.2

Next, amplitude. 1/2 (.002g) (100m/s2) = 1/2 100n/m x2
therefore, x equals out to .45, or 45 cm?



Does this make sense, I think I have the period right, but one of my friends got 1 cm for the amplitude and another one of my friends got 0.83 seconds for the period. Any ideas?


Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's been a mistake.
You took an inelastic collision for a completely elastic one.Instead conserve momentum to find velocity of bullet-block system and then proceed for momentum.
 
That makes great sense. Thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top