How Do Commutators of Functions of Observables Work in Quantum Mechanics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the commutation relations in quantum mechanics, specifically the commutators of functions of observables. The key equations derived are [x_i, G(𝑝)] = iħ(∂G/∂p_i) and [p_i, F(𝑥)] = -iħ(∂F/∂x_i), applicable for functions F(𝑥) and G(𝑝) that can be expressed as power series. The participants emphasize the importance of using the multivariable Taylor series for vector operators and clarify that higher-order terms in the series vanish when applying the commutation relations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly commutation relations.
  • Familiarity with Taylor series expansions in multiple variables.
  • Knowledge of vector operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Proficiency in calculus, specifically partial derivatives.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the multivariable Taylor series in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the implications of commutation relations on quantum state functions.
  • Learn about the role of vector operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate advanced topics in quantum mechanics, such as the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists working with quantum observables, and researchers exploring the mathematical foundations of quantum theory will benefit from this discussion.

WisheDeom
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Quantum Theory: Commutators of Functions of Observables

Homework Statement



First is a question from Sakurai Modern Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., 1.29a.

Show that

[x_i,G(\mathbf{p})] = i\hbar\frac{\partial G}{\partial p_i}

and

[p_i,F(\mathbf{x})] = - i\hbar\frac{\partial F}{\partial x_i}

for any functions F(\mathbf{x}) and G(\mathbf{p}) which can be expanded in power series of their arguments.



Homework Equations



Definition of a Taylor series of a function f of variable x expanded around point a:

f(x) = \sum^{\infty}_{n=0} \frac{f^{(n)}(a)}{n!}(x-a)

Commutator of position and momentum operators: [x_i,p_j]=i\hbar\delta_{ij}.



The Attempt at a Solution



I tried a general solution, i.e. looking at the commutator [F(\mathbf{x}), G(\mathbf{p})]. The first problem I'm having is with the concept of taking derivatives with respect to operators. Can I simply treat x as a scalar while computing \frac{\partial F}{\partial x}, for example? Is

\frac{\partial}{\partial x}(x^2) = 2x

valid?

Assuming I have that right, I am really stuck on the Taylor expansion itself. I don't see why powers of higher than first order would disappear. I assume my solution will look something like


[F(\mathbf{x}),G(\mathbf{p})] = [\mathbf{x},\mathbf{p}]\frac{\partial F}{\partial x_i}\frac{\partial G}{\partial p_i}

which would satisfy the problem, but I don't know how to get there.

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


WisheDeom said:
I tried a general solution, i.e. looking at the commutator [F(\mathbf{x}), G(\mathbf{p})]. The first problem I'm having is with the concept of taking derivatives with respect to operators. Can I simply treat x as a scalar while computing \frac{\partial F}{\partial x}, for example? Is

\frac{\partial}{\partial x}(x^2) = 2x

valid?

Assuming I have that right, I am really stuck on the Taylor expansion itself. I don't see why powers of higher than first order would disappear. I assume my solution will look something like[F(\mathbf{x}),G(\mathbf{p})] = [\mathbf{x},\mathbf{p}]\frac{\partial F}{\partial x_i}\frac{\partial G}{\partial p_i}

which would satisfy the problem, but I don't know how to get there.

Thank you!

Here, \mathbf{x} and \mathbf{p} are vector operators, so if you use a Taylor expansion, you will need to use the multivariable form, given in equation (31) here.

Luckily, you can avoid that entirely, all you need for this problem is the general form of the series expansion of G(\mathbf{p}) (and your commutation relation of course). In 3 dimensions, the series expansion has the general form G(\mathbf{p}) = \sum_{n_1=0}^\infty \sum_{n_2=0}^\infty \sum_{n_3=0}^\infty g(n_1, n_2, n_3 ) (p_1)^{n_1}(p_2)^{n_2}(p_3)^{n_3}. That is, you expect a series that in general has has a term for each possible combination of (positive integer) powers of each p_j.

What is [x_j, G(\mathbf{p})] according to this general expansion? What is \frac{\partial G}{\partial p_i}?
 
Last edited:
Ah! Thank you, that was straightforward.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K