How Do Conservative Forces Affect Potential Energy and Velocity?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the potential energy of a 29 kg object influenced by a conservative force defined by F = (-2.4)x + (-5.2)x² when the object is at x = 2.0 m, yielding a potential energy of 18.7 J. Participants highlight the need to determine the object's initial kinetic energy at x = 5.0 m, where it has a velocity of 5.3 m/s. To find the speed as the object passes through the origin, users suggest calculating the additional kinetic energy gained from the conservative force as it moves from x = 5 to x = 0. The discussion emphasizes using integrals and energy conservation principles to solve the problem. Overall, the thread provides insights into applying physics concepts to analyze the effects of conservative forces on energy and velocity.
PennStateFan1
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
A 29 kg object is acted on by a conservative force given by F = (-2.4)x + (-5.2)x2, with F in Newtons and x in meters. Take the potential energy associated with the force to be zero when the object is at x = 0. What is the potential energy of the system associated with the force when the object is at x = 2.0 m?


If the object has a velocity of 5.3 m/s in the negative direction of the x-axis when it is at x = 5.0 m, what is its speed when it passes through the origin?



Homework Statement



I know how to get the first part.

Homework Equations



U is the negative integral of F(x)

The Attempt at a Solution



the first part is - integral from 0 to 2 of -2.4x-5.2x^2=18.7
I don't know where to begin with the second part
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello PennStateFan1,

Welcome to Physics Forum.

The object has an initial kinetic energy, at x = 5, as should be pretty easy to calculate.

Then the object picks up an additional amount of kinetic energy (going from x = 5 to x = 0) given to it by the conservative force. You should be able to figure out how much additional kinetic energy by using pretty much the same method that you used in the first part of the problem, just with different numbers, signs and such.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top