How Do Dedekind Cuts Prove Convergence of Rational Sequences?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jgens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequences
jgens
Gold Member
Messages
1,575
Reaction score
50

Homework Statement



Prove that every non-decreasing, bounded sequence of rational numbers converges to some real number using Dedekind cuts.

Homework Equations



A real number is a set \alpha, of rational numbers, with the following four properties:
  • If x \in \alpha and y is a rational number with y < x, then y \in \alpha.
  • \alpha \neq \emptyset
  • \alpha \neq \mathbb{Q}
  • There is no greatest element in \alpha; in other words, if x \in \alpha, then there is some y \in \alpha with y > x

The Attempt at a Solution



This seems to be a straight forward proof, but I can't seem to complete it satisfactorily; any advice and/or suggestions are appreciated. Well, here goes nothing . . .

Let \{a_n\} be a non-decreasing, bounded sequence of rational numbers and define the set \alpha \subset \mathbb{Q} such that \alpha = \{x \in \mathbb{Q}: x < a_n \;\mathrm{where}\; n \in \mathbb{N}\}. Now, to prove that \alpha is a real number, we need only verify that our four conditions hold:
  • Suppose x\in\alpha. Then x < a_n for some n \in \mathbb{N}. Now, let y < x, then y < a_n and consequently y\in\alpha
  • Clearly \alpha \neq \emptyset
  • Since \{a_n\} is bounded above, this means that there must be some rational number x > a_n for all n\in\mathbb{N}. Thus x \notin \alpha and consequently \alpha \neq \mathbb{Q}
  • Suppose x\in\alpha. Then, for some n\in\mathbb{N} we have that x < a_n. Since x,a_n\in\mathbb{Q} we know that \varepsilon = \frac{a_n - x}{2} \in \mathbb{Q}. Consequently, x < x + \varepsilon < a_n. Therefore, \alpha contains no greatest element.
Now, I just need to prove that \alpha is the real number that this sequence converges to. Intuitively, it seems like it should be, but how might I articulate an appropriate argument? Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First show that every n, \alpha_n< \alpha. Then show that for any epsilon, there exist n such that \alpha- \alpha_n< \epsilon.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top