How Do Different Dirac Matrix Choices Impact RQM Equations?

Hymne
Messages
87
Reaction score
1
Hello!
I'm trying to write an essay on RQM. The problem I have encountered is the diffrent choices of matrices for the dirac equation.

The two choices that I´m mixing up in my equations are:

\begin{eqnarray}
\gamma^0 = \left( \begin{array}{cc}
I & 0 \\
0 & -I \end{array} \right), \quad
&&\gamma^1 = \left( \begin{array}{cc}
0 & \sigma_1 \\
-\sigma_1 & 0 \end{array} \right), \quad
\gamma^2 = \left( \begin{array}{cc}
0 & \sigma_2 \\
-\sigma_2 & 0 \end{array} \right) \\, \quad
&&\gamma^3 = \left( \begin{array}{cc}
0 & \sigma_3 \\
-\sigma_3 & 0 \end{array} \right),
\end{eqnarray}

And

\begin{eqnarray}
\boldsymbol{\alpha} = \left( \begin{array}{cc}
\boldsymbol{0} & \boldsymbol{\sigma_i} \\
\boldsymbol{\sigma_i} & \boldsymbol{0} \end{array} \right), \quad
&&\beta = \left( \begin{array}{cc}
\boldsymbol{1} & \boldsymbol{0} \\
\boldsymbol{0} & -\boldsymbol{1} \end{array} \right),
\label{dirachpaulimatris}
\end{eqnarray}

I clearly need to work with just one of them.
What are the benefits of working with the former respectivly the latter representation? :/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's no reason not to use both. The γ's are useful for relativistic problems, while α, β are useful in the nonrelativistic limit, the relationship being γ0 = β, γi = β αi
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top