How do E Folds relate to real distance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
E-folds provide a measure of the universe's expansion, indicating that one e-fold corresponds to an expansion by a factor of e (approximately 2.71828). The discussion raises questions about the relationship between e-folds and "real distance," particularly in the context of horizon growth during inflation. It is suggested that while e-folds quantify expansion, their direct correlation to physical distances may not be straightforward. The concept emphasizes that all distances between comoving objects increase uniformly with each e-fold. Understanding this relationship is crucial for comprehending cosmic inflation and the dynamics of the universe's expansion.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
How do E Folds relate to real distance?
 
Space news on Phys.org
e-folds number is giving you a measure of the expansion ...
I am not sure if they will in general relate to any real distance (what do you mean by real distance?)...maybe with the Horizon growth during inflation...
 
One "e-fold" means the universe has expanded by a factor of ##e## (the base of natural logarithms, 2.71828...), so all distances between comoving objects have increased by the same factor.
 
  • Like
Likes cristo
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top