How Do Forces Act on an Elevator in Motion and at Rest?

[pinkyjoshi65]

The h frm the centre to point A is 0.75m and the h frm the centre to point B is also 0.75. so the total distance between A and B is 1.5m. change in height will be 1.5?..

 

[Hootenanny]

The h frm the centre to point A is 0.75m and the h frm the centre to point B is also 0.75. so the total distance between A and B is 1.5m. change in height will be 1.5?..

Sounds good to me

 

[pinkyjoshi65]

sp doing that i got v as 5.42m/s and F will b 7.83 N. and substituting in T-mg we get T as 9.79N. what about part C? how do i find the angle

 

[Hootenanny]

sp doing that i got v as 5.42m/s and F will b 7.83 N. and substituting in T-mg we get T as 9.79N. what about part C? how do i find the angle

Well, suppose the centre of the path remains the same, how does the energy of the rock change?

 

[pinkyjoshi65]

it continuously changes into kinetic energy since its in motion..?

 

[Hootenanny]

it continuously changes into kinetic energy since its in motion..?

It will have some kinetic energy, but it will also have some potential energy since it is some height above the base of the vertical path. Do you follow?

 

[pinkyjoshi65]

oh yes...!..now i get it..so how can i use it to find the angle?

 

[Hootenanny]

oh yes...!..now i get it..so how can i use it to find the angle?

The trouble is, the angle will depend on the velocity, which will depend on the height above our zero potential, which depends on the angle. If you haven't done so I suggest you draw yourself a diagram. The string will form the hyp on a right-angled triangle, with the base being \sin\theta (where \theta is the angle between the string and the horizontal) and the vertical side being \cos\theta. Also mark on the point B of our vertical circle (this is our zero potential) and let h be the vertical height of our rock above the point B.

Have you got the picture straight?

 

[pinkyjoshi65]

not really..you lost me..can you explain it again..

 

[Hootenanny]

not really..you lost me..can you explain it again..

Sorry, let me try and clarify;

1. Draw a right triangle
2. lable the hypotenues R, this is your string.
3. lable the vertical side \cos\theta
4. lable the horizontal side \sin\theta
5. lable the angle between the hypotentues and the vertical side \theta
6. Draw a circle at the corner where the hypotenues meets the horizontal side, this is your rock.
7. Extend the vertical line down some arbitrary distance and draw a circle at the end of your line
8. Label the distance between the cicle you just drew and the corner between the hypotentues and the vertical side h. This is your height above the base.

Is this a better picture?

 

[pinkyjoshi65]

yes this is much better..then..?

 

[Hootenanny]

yes this is much better..then..?

Draw the forces that are acting on your rock.

 

[pinkyjoshi65]

ok..so there r 2 forces acting tension (up) and mg down..then..

 

[Hootenanny]

ok..so there r 2 forces acting tension (up) and mg down..then..

The tension isn't actually acting upwards, it will be acting along the string, but a component of the tension will be acting upwards. Do you follow?

 

[pinkyjoshi65]

No..

 

[Hootenanny]

No..

It's difficult to explain without the aid of a diagram, does this <http://www.ngsir.netfirms.com/englishhtm/ConicalPendulum.htm> make anymore sense? If it doesn't try googling 'conical pendulum'.

 

[pinkyjoshi65]

ok now i got it..so the diagram is like this: the hypotunese is the radius, the base is sin(theta), the vertical line is cos(theta). the rock is attached to the hypotunese. 2 forces act on the rock, mg: downwards and T along the hypotunese. Theta is between the hypotunese and the vertical line(costheta)..then..cos theta + plus a certain dist is costheta+h

 

[Hootenanny]

So, what can you say about the vertical component of the tension when compared with the force of gravity acting on the rock?

 

[pinkyjoshi65]

the vertical component of the tension is acting in the oppostie direction to the mg of the rock..?

 

[-RA-]

looks as if hootenanny's gone, i'll have a quick bash,

the opposing forces are the same, as grvaity is the only force acting on the rock. At any set time the vertical componet of the tension of the string = mg.

When you know the vertical component of the tension you can then find the hypotenuse, which should be the tension in the string,

sound right to u?

 

[pinkyjoshi65]

uh..but how can we find the T when we don't know theta or the horizontal component of Tension

 

[-RA-]

good point, you will need to find either Theta or the horizontal component, but you don't have that.

do we know what the height of the rock is compared to when it is at rest?

maybe with that you can use GPE = mgh? to be honest I'm not sure, ill leave this to an expert before i confuse you even more!

 

[pinkyjoshi65]

k..thnkz..

 

[Hootenanny]

the vertical component of the tension is acting in the oppostie direction to the mg of the rock..?

Correct,
the opposing forces are the same, as grvaity is the only force acting on the rock. At any set time the vertical componet of the tension of the string = mg.[/quote]
Again, correct

uh..but how can we find the T when we don't know theta or the horizontal component of Tension

Also correct..

good point, you will need to find either Theta or the horizontal component, but you don't have that.

maybe with that you can use GPE = mgh? to be honest I'm not sure, ill leave this to an expert before i confuse you even more!

Sounds like a plan to me.

So from the above statements we know that the vertical component of the tension is equal to the weight, in maths that would be;

T\cos\theta = mg

Do you follow? Assuming you do the we also know that the vertical side of your right triangle can be written as;

R\cos\theta = R-h

Where R is the length of your string and h is the vertical height of the stone above our zero potential (the bottom of the circular path in the previous questions [point B]). If you can't see where this came from check your diagram.

Once you understand where that came from we need to move onto calculating the tension, but for that we need to know the velocity. We need to be careful at this point, the circular path of the rock traces out the base of the cone (check the link I provided) and therefore the radius of the circular path (lets call it r is not the length of the string R, it will actually be the length of the base of the triangle i.e;

r = R\sin\theta

Do you follow?

Therefore, for the net horizontal force for the circular motion can be written as;

F_x = \frac{mv^2}{r} = \frac{mv^2}{R\sin\theta}

Do you follow?

I know this is a heavy post, so we'll leave it there for now and we'll pick it up once you've digested all of it.

 

[pinkyjoshi65]

ahan..

 

[Hootenanny]

Now it's your turn to do some work. Can you write a conservation of energy equation for the potential and kinetic energy of the particle?

 

[pinkyjoshi65]

E_t= E_k+E_p= 0.5mv^2+ mgh

 

[Hootenanny]

E_t= E_k+E_p= 0.5mv^2+ mgh

Now, if we assume that the total energy must be the same as that for the vertical path we can write;

mg(2R) =\frac{1}{2}mv^2 + mgh

4gR = v^2 + 2gh

Do you follow?

 

[pinkyjoshi65]

yes..

 

[Hootenanny]

Good, so can you now take the final equation and re-write it as a function of \theta instead of h?