How do I calculate voltage drops and currents in a resistor circuit problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter subzero0137
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Resistor
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
subzero0137
Messages
91
Reaction score
4
7xXyKU0_d.jpg


Relevant equations:
V=IR

Attempt at solution:

When the switches are open, R1, R2 and R3 are in series so the current in that case would be 12 V/ (2 ohms + 3 ohms + 3 ohms) = 1.5 A. When the switches are closed, the current across R3 is still 1.5 A, so the voltage drop across R3 is 1.5 A * 3 ohms = 4.5 V. I don't know how to calculate the voltage drops across other resistors and the currents through them. How do I proceed? I know we can ignore R2 when the switches are closed since it gets shorted, and I know R and R3 are in parallel when the switches are closed.
 
on Phys.org
Your reasoning so far is correct.
subzero0137 said:
so the voltage drop across R3 is 1.5 A * 3 ohms = 4.5 V.
Yes.
So, what is the voltage across R1? Apply KVL to the loop containing ε, R3 and R1.
 
cnh1995 said:
Your reasoning so far is correct.

Yes.
So, what is the voltage across R1? Apply KVL to the loop containing ε, R3 and R1.

ε - (I*R1) - (1.5A *R3) = 12 V - (I*R1) - (1.5*3) = 0 therefore I*R1 = 7.5 V. The current across R1 is 7.5/3 = 2.5 A, therefore the current across R = 1 A. Since the voltage drop across R and R3 is the same (4.5 V), the resistance of R is 4.5/1 = 4.5 ohms. Is that correct?
 
subzero0137 said:
ε - (I*R1) - (1.5A *R3) = 12 V - (I*R1) - (1.5*3) = 0 therefore I*R1 = 7.5 V. The current across R1 is 7.5/3 = 2.5 A, therefore the current across R = 1 A. Since the voltage drop across R and R3 is the same (4.5 V), the resistance of R is 4.5/1 = 4.5 ohms. Is that correct?
It is perfect! :smile:
 
Complicated simplification?
If we call the unknown resistance R, R4, then does everybody agree that this problem gives in general

R4/R1 = R3/R2
as the condition for currents in R3 equal for both cases?
A formula (recalling a bridge balancing condition) that seems to be 'suggestive' - but I don't know what it suggests. Can the circuits be switched around somehow to make it obvious what the answer should be? Is there some known principle involved? Duality or something?
 
Last edited: