How do I check if a 1x1 matrix is diagonal, lower/upper triangular?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hkBattousai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
hkBattousai
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
I have an A matrix with dimensions 1x1. Its the only term a11 is an arbitrary number.

For what values of a11, this A matrix is;

  1. Diagonal
  2. Upper triangular
  3. Lower triangular
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hkBattousai said:
I have an A matrix with dimensions 1x1. Its the only term a11 is an arbitrary number.

For what values of a11, this A matrix is;

  1. Diagonal
  2. Upper triangular
  3. Lower triangular

By definition a 1x1 matrix will be upper and lower triangular. (But not strictly; for strictly upper and lower: a must be 0).

A matrix is diagonal if it is triangular and normal. Normal (for a matrix whose elements lie in the domain of real numbers) means A \ A^T = A^T \ A
 
A matrix is diagonal if it has no nonzero entries off the diagonal. A matrix is upper triangular if it has no nonzero entries below the diagonal. etc.

Clearly any 1x1 matrix satisfies these properties, since there are no entries off the diagonal, nonzero or not.
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top