How do I correctly notate the domain and range of a function using sets?

Feldoh
Messages
1,336
Reaction score
3
I was just wondering if you could write a functions domain and range with a set?

Would it be something like

D: {x \epsilon \mathbb{R} | any condtitions}
R: {f(x) \epsilon \mathbb{R} | any condtitions}

for any function f(x)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What exactly is your question? Look at the definitions of "domain" and "range" (of a function). Of course they are sets. And of course that, in the definition of "range", some conditions must be satisfied, namely, R(f) = {f(x) : x is in the domain of f}.
 
His question is simple, Can you write the domain and range of a function as sets. The answer is Yes, because they are sets.
 
Diffy said:
His question is simple, Can you write the domain and range of a function as sets. The answer is Yes, because they are sets.

Thanks for the replies. I know that the domain and range are sets, I was more asking along the lines of is my set "notation" correct? Sorry, I should have asked that to begin with...
 
Should have asked what? If you know that "domain" and "range" of a function are sets, then of course they can be written in "set notation"!
 
Feldoh said:
I was more asking along the lines of is my set "notation" correct?

You don’t need to put “any condition” - the vertical bar should read “such that” so when you write a set ask yourself is what you wrote makes sense saying "such that" for |. Also you could just put R for your example of domain. If you gave the set you gave as range for an answer you should get 0 points. When a book ask you to find the range they are asking for the range specific to that function; yours just trys to restate the definition.

Typically they will look something like

R-{0} or something like {x | x >= 0 and x is an element of R}
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top