How do I delay current in a circuit

AI Thread Summary
To create a delay for lights 2 and 3 in a circuit while keeping light 1 lit first, a user is exploring options without modifying the existing switch. Suggestions include using electronic Delay On Timer relays, which eliminate the need for capacitors and resistors, ensuring all lights turn off simultaneously. The discussion also touches on using CMOS logic gates and NPN transistors for a more complex solution, with a focus on the RC time constant for timing the delays. The user is particularly interested in applying this to car turn signals to achieve a sequential lighting effect. Further details about the voltage and wattage of the bulbs are needed for more precise recommendations.
eddie90
Messages
48
Reaction score
1
Hello all, hope everyone is having a good week so far.

Anyway I am trying to solve a problem, hopefully you guys can help me with this.
I made a quick drawing on Paint to try to explain myself, sorry for the poor art.

So basically in the circuit shown in my drawing, if you hit the switch then lights 1, 2 and 3 will receive 12 Volts DC and light up.
The effect that I want to achieve is to create a delay on lights 2 and 3. So when you close the switch, light 1 will light up 1st, then after a few milliseconds, light 2 will light up, and finally after a few more milliseconds, light 3 will light up. At this point all 3 lights are on. And once you open the switch all 3 lights will turn off at the same time.

I want to know if there is a simple way of doing this. The circuit in my drawing is an existing circuit, I would like to modify it to do what I explained above. I really don’t want to involve an Arduino or something of that caliber. Is there a simpler alternative? Maybe some type of component that I can place right before lights 2 and 3 to create that delay I need?

I was thinking capacitors maybe?? But That might not work since I need all 3 lights to turn off at the same time once the switch it re opened, and if I use capacitors this probably won't happen right?

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • Circuit.JPG
    Circuit.JPG
    16.2 KB · Views: 961
Engineering news on Phys.org
You'd have to calculate your RC time constants yourself. The switch is a 3 pole 2 throw switch readily available for cheap off RS. You have to wire up the "main pole" up NO and the other 2 poles need to be NC, this will discharge the caps ready for the next time you operate the "main pole".

circuit222222.jpg
 
jonlg_uk, Thanks for the quick response and diagram!

Sorry to be a drag but I did not fully understand everything you said, I have to point out I have not studied EE. I have read a few beginner/intermediate books though.

RC time constant refers to what capacitor I would use correct? If so, yea I figured if I went this route I would have to figure out what size caps to use.

Now I did some research on the switch you talked about and it sounds like that would work. But I failed to mentioned that I cannot modify the switch(the one I drew on the diagram). The switch mechanism cannot be changed, what I can do is modify the circuit after the switch, where the lights are. So that's why I'm wondering how I can do this, is there a special relay I can use with the caps or something like that?THANK YOU
 
eddie90 said:
jonlg_uk, Thanks for the quick response and diagram!

Sorry to be a drag but I did not fully understand everything you said, I have to point out I have not studied EE. I have read a few beginner/intermediate books though.

RC time constant refers to what capacitor I would use correct? If so, yea I figured if I went this route I would have to figure out what size caps to use.

Now I did some research on the switch you talked about and it sounds like that would work. But I failed to mentioned that I cannot modify the switch(the one I drew on the diagram). The switch mechanism cannot be changed, what I can do is modify the circuit after the switch, where the lights are. So that's why I'm wondering how I can do this, is there a special relay I can use with the caps or something like that?


THANK YOU

Yes you can get electronic Delay On Timer relays these are readily available from rswww. If you go down that route then there is no need for capacitors or resistors like I drew.

Here is something similar to what you need:

http://www.ics-timers.com/op4142_2.html
 
If you are not familiar with EE, buying after market delay will be the best way to go if they are available. RC is not a good way as the R will drop voltage and rob some of the voltage from the bulb, so your bulb two and three is going to be dimmer. It gets a lot more complicated if you want them to shut off at the same time as you are going to have to discharge the cap. Opening the power switch do not automatically discharge the cap even if you use a diode for discharging, you literally have to switch to ground to discharge the cap. Then another complication arise...the in rush current through the diode to discharge the cap is going to be high and not only you need a big diode, you need a robust switch to take the high current surge so you won't melt the contact...

Why do you want to delay such a small amount of time, I don't think you can see a few mS difference.
 
yungman said:
Why do you want to delay such a small amount of time, I don't think you can see a few mS difference.

Yeah I read somewhere that it takes a human about 1/10 of a second to react to a stimulus, not sure if this applies to being able to distinguish between stimulus.
 
You are right, I'm not sure exactly how long the delay needs to be but it is about 200 to maybe 300 milliseconds.

The more I think about this it gets more complicated though. I know its possible because I've seen it done. I'll explain what exactly I was trying to accomplish here.

So basically this is for a car's turn signals. My car has 3 bulbs on each turn signal(left and right). When you activate one of the blinkers(left or right), the 3 corresponding bulbs start flashing. Now I've seen very simple looking kits sold that make the 3 bulbs light up in a sequence rather than all at the same time. The kit looks simple because all it is, is a harness identical to the original harness plus a little black box, of course I don't know what is inside that little black box but I thought it should not be something crazy out of this world.

Attached is a picture of the harness. It is sort of pricey for me and I thought it was simple enough to build myself but I'm starting to think its not as simple as I thought :frown:

I wonder if I just have to split the amount of time that my turn signal stays on into 3 and allocate that time into each one of the 3 bulbs. Or I wonder if maybe each cycle(each blink) is not long enough to do this effect so maybe the kit does something more complicated like use capacitors or something to elongate each cycle and give each bulb an equal amount of ON time.

Like I said I think is a little more complicated than I thought. I will go outside right now and test my turn signals and see how long they stay on.

Let me know if you guys think this is too much or if you have any suggestions for me to try :confused:

Also here is the link to a video of the kit i mentioned so you guys can see the effect it creates




THANK YOU ALL for you time
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jonlg_uk said:
Yes you can get electronic Delay On Timer relays these are readily available from rswww. If you go down that route then there is no need for capacitors or resistors like I drew.

Here is something similar to what you need:

http://www.ics-timers.com/op4142_2.html

So you think I can use this for the application I explained?
 
OK, I don't know how much you can follow. I don't know what is the wattage of the light. But this is a simple circuit using a CMOS NOR and an NPN transistor. This is assuming you use DC to power the lamp. I don't know the latest CMOS gate family and I am too lazy to look at data sheet. So I did not specify the part number for you.

The delay is governed by the RC, so you can have two of this with one having a long RC time constant for bulb 3.

I choose CMOS gate to get a higher switching threshold voltage for the RC part. TTL is not good.

Take a look, this is not a finished circuit, just an idea. If you think you can build it and need more help, post back.
 

Attachments

  • Delay light L.png
    Delay light L.png
    12.2 KB · Views: 900
Last edited:
  • #10
There used to be a TV show a long time ago and it was called Knight Rider. It was pretty bad, but there was a car in it that had all sorts of lighting effects on it.

If you do a search on Google:
https://www.google.com.au/search?nu...2965.2j0j9j0j1.12.0...0.0...1ac.1.VKmtIp6wn6M

you can find a lot of lighting circuits that give effects of multiple LEDs switching on in turn.
The circuits can be used to switch high current lamps if the lamps are driven by power transistors.

However, you probably shouldn't be playing with the electronics of your car unless you know what you are doing.
 
  • #11
yungman said:
OK, I don't know how much you can follow. I don't know what is the wattage of the light. But this is a simple circuit using a CMOS NAND and an NPN transistor. This is assuming you use DC to power the lamp. I don't know the latest CMOS gate family and I am too lazy to look at data sheet. So I did not specify the part number for you.

The delay is governed by the RC, so you can have two of this with one having a long RC time constant for bulb 3.

I choose CMOS gate to get a higher switching threshold voltage for the RC part. TTL is not good.

Take a look, this is not a finished circuit, just an idea. If you think you can build it and need more help, post back.

Awesome! Yea I've used an NPN transistor before for simple circuit projects. The rest I will have to do some research on but at least I have a direction to take now. Thats mainly what I needed since I was sort of clue less.

I will post back if I run into trouble

Thanks for your help!
 
  • #12
If you are more serious about going for it, give more detail about what voltage DC you are using, what is the wattage of the bulb. So we can track and offer more solid suggestion. Right now, it's just talking in the thin air. If the bulb is high wattage and need more current, a darlington NPN or even an N MOSFET is possible. Just more details.
 
  • #13
Sorry, I wasn't thinking, It should be a NOR gate, not NAND. I edited the original post already. Sorry.
 
  • #14
Oh ok got it, thanks for the correction.

And yes I am serious about building this. I am at work right now but when I get home I will check the bulb wattage.

As far as Voltage, I'm almost certain it uses 12V from the car battery but I will double check this as well

P.S. Just some background on myself, I am 22 and I'm currently doing my GEs at a community college and am planning on working towards a BS in Electrical with Computer Engineering at CSULA. I have been in a couple robotics clubs and such things so I do have some experience with electronics just not as much as you guys. But I can get around by doing research when I get stuck, so thanks for your help
 
  • #15
Now the design is much clearer. If you are using 12V, look into the old CMOS 4000 series logic family that was popular in the 70s.

http://www.analog.com/static/imported-files/rarely_asked_questions/4000_Series_Article.pdf

They work with Vcc up to 15V. They are perfect for you as you don't need an extra supply to power the logic. Keep R3 like 20K or lower and R1 at least 200K. I would use a N MOSFET, then you eliminate R2 all together. The 4000 family has very weak drive, MOSFET will be the best choice.

Be very careful when handling these logic. In my days, this family have no protection at the input and they are very susceptible to static damage. Always store them in static protection bags or foam. Ground yourself to the Earth ground before you even think about handling them. My experience is they never burn right on the spot, they get "injured"! They usual die in a few days. I remember every time we probe the board, certain IC will die in a few days. It was to the point when the system failed, we just change one particular chip without even trouble shoot. It was that predictable. The one that was the worst was 4049 inverter. The NOR did not seem to be as bad. We were not careful about grounding ourselves, but if you take all the precaution, they are very reliable.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Very useful information!

Hmm ok now if I'm not mistaken,the "4001: Quad 2-input NOR gate" is the one I need for this application correct?
 
  • #17
eddie90 said:
Very useful information!

Hmm ok now if I'm not mistaken,the "4001: Quad 2-input NOR gate" is the one I need for this application correct?

Yes. Make sure you ground all the other unused inputs. Tell me the wattage of your bulbs, I might be able to choose a MOSFET for you. I have good experience ordering in DigiKey, they ship FAST! average 3 days! They should carry everything you need...I am not advertizing for Digitkey, I have not try other places, I hit the jackpot with the first one, never have any reason to try others.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
Awesome! I was just trying to figure out where to buy these things, I was looking around on Google. I’ve only bought stuff from SparkFun, RadioShack and a vendor called NerdKits. Never DigiKey But it looks like they have a huge inventory

Anyway I’m still at work but I just looked up replacement bulbs for my car on the Autozone website and this is what the specs said.

Bulb Voltage: 12.8
Bulb Wattage: 28.54

I am guessing they are the same as the ones I have in my car right now since they are supposed to be replacements but I will double check this as soon as I get home.
 
  • #19
yungman said:
Take a look, this is not a finished circuit, just an idea.

So I will need to repeat the circuit you drew for lights 2 and 3 on both turn signals right?
 
  • #20
Then it should be very easy, 28W means it's draw less than 3A, plenty of MOSFET can do it for you.
Yes, you need two of the circuits for two different bulbs. You change the R1 and/or C to set different delay time.

I am waiting for an important call right now, I'll try to look up a MOSFET for you by tomorrow. I take you want the components with leads rather than surface mount?
 
  • #21
yungman said:
Then it should be very easy, 28W means it's draw less than 3A, plenty of MOSFET can do it for you.
Yes, you need two of the circuits for two different bulbs. You change the R1 and/or C to set different delay time.

I am waiting for an important call right now, I'll try to look up a MOSFET for you by tomorrow. I take you want the components with leads rather than surface mount?

Great! Yea whenever you get a chance is good, I appreciate your time thank you so much.

And yea I prefer leads, I don't have experience soldering surface mount components yet
 
  • #22
eddie90 said:
Great! Yea whenever you get a chance is good, I appreciate your time thank you so much.

And yea I prefer leads, I don't have experience soldering surface mount components yet

OK, my call went smoothly, so here it is:

http://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/IRFZ14PBF/IRFZ14PBF-ND/811717

This is the first one I saw, not necessary the best one. You can buy anyone in Radio Shack or Fry's. I just look for one that is twice the voltage requirement ( anything higher than 30V) and can sink more than 6A. The gate source voltage has to be able to handle 0V to 15V.

The requirement is very easy. Don't get too big a transistor, the bigger the MOSFET, the higher the input capacitance. The output drive of the 4001 is not very strong. High input capacitance will slow down the switching time. It is not critical as you are looking at mS though.
 
  • #23
Oh ok got it. I'm learning a lot thanks

Glad to hear about your call. And I will just go ahead order from digikey. Sorry to bug you more though, but do you think you can give me a link to a 4001 on digikey please?

I am looking for one but I see a lot of results(I think I'm looking in the right place), under Logic - Gates and Inverters.

I appreciate it.
 
  • #25
Hmm I see, I thought I would have to buy 4 separate ones, two for bulbs 2 and 3 on the left and 2 for bulbs 2 and 3 on the right. But yea I see now that it says "number of circuits: 4"

I also see that it says "Inputs: 2" though? This doesn't mean I won't be able to handle all 4 bulbs right?

Oh and one more thing, do they have this same model but with leads rather than surface mount?
 
  • #26
Vk6Kro is correct, you only need one IC. Everyone has 4 gates, so you can build 4 light bulb circuits with one IC. That's the reason I told you to ground the unused inputs of the extra gates. Get the one in DIP package though.
 
  • #28
Got it thank you guys!

I will read up more about RCs and read the datasheets of the items I'm ordering while I wait for them to get here.

So to sum it up I will be buying one of those 4001s and four of the transistors yungman mentioned correct?

I'm exited about this! lol
 
  • #29
Yes, it looks like a good circuit.

Just keep all your connecting wires VERY short and it should work OK.
 
  • #30
vk6kro said:
Yes, it looks like a good circuit.

Just keep all your connecting wires VERY short and it should work OK.

Hmm, about keeping the connections short.. I was looking at the wiring today and it is Not a single bundle of wires that come from the front of the car and then split, some to the left and some to the right. Its actually two sets of wires that come from the front of the car, one on each side of the car, and each one goes straight into its corresponding side's tail lights.

So in order to use one 4001 for both lights I was going to have to bridge from the left side of the car to the right(or vice versa). Would this affect the circuit? If so I can just buy two of them.
 
  • #31
Oh nvm I think I can just do the bridge from one side to the other Before my circuit and I should be ok right?
 
  • #32
I would buy about 4 of them.

Then you could make a test circuit first before you try to put it in the car. It is OK to just use one gate per chip. They are cheap enough to do this.

And I would mount the IC upside down on a bit of printed circuit board. You can make connecting points out of the printed circuit board by cutting around small areas on the board to isolate them electrically, if you don't want to make a proper printed circuit.
 
  • #33
vk6kro said:
I would buy about 4 of them.

Then you could make a test circuit first before you try to put it in the car. It is OK to just use one gate per chip. They are cheap enough to do this.

And I would mount the IC upside down on a bit of printed circuit board. You can make connecting points out of the printed circuit board by cutting around small areas on the board to isolate them electrically, if you don't want to make a proper printed circuit.

Oh ok yea that sounds like a great idea.
And I will also try the circuit board technique, I can get many different kinds of them at work.
 
  • #34
When you wire the 4001, try your best to use a socket so you can change the IC easily. I know it is going to be much harder to wire a socket on a breadboard. But take my word, it's worth your time. Unless they improve the 4000 IC, they burn when you experiment the R1 and C value. You solder and de-solder the R and C a few time, it's going to die! It was so predictable in my days that everytime I extended the card out and probe a particular line, one IC needed to be change in a few days. The kicker is they never die on the spot, they die in a few days.

The new 74HCxx don't seems to have any of this problem, but they take 5V or even 3.3V. It's not good for you for many reasons.

Buy a few more spares on the IC, even stock one or two of the MOSFET. The cost of shipping is so much more than these cheap components. That's the bad part of Digikey, the shipping. Choose USPS instead of UPS or FedEx, they are more.
 
  • #35
yungman said:
When you wire the 4001, try your best to use a socket so you can change the IC easily. I know it is going to be much harder to wire a socket on a breadboard. But take my word, it's worth your time. Unless they improve the 4000 IC, they burn when you experiment the R1 and C value. You solder and de-solder the R and C a few time, it's going to die! It was so predictable in my days that everytime I extended the card out and probe a particular line, one IC needed to be change in a few days. The kicker is they never die on the spot, they die in a few days.

The new 74HCxx don't seems to have any of this problem, but they take 5V or even 3.3V. It's not good for you for many reasons.

Buy a few more spares on the IC, even stock one or two of the MOSFET. The cost of shipping is so much more than these cheap components. That's the bad part of Digikey, the shipping. Choose USPS instead of UPS or FedEx, they are more.

I've never used a socket but it makes sense to use one here, thanks for the tip.
I can de-solder a few at work from old circuit boards, I see them almost every day.

I will order extras of the two just in case.
 
  • #36
Ok so I am placing my order today since I just got paid but I have one more question, hopefully you have time to answer it.

I want to go ahead and throw in some capacitors into my order while I'm at it.
What kind of capacitors should I use though? On this page there are a lot of different categories, I'm not sure which one to use.

http://www.digikey.com/catalog/en/category/passives/capacitors/11572

I see Tantalum, Aluminum Electrolytic, Mica and PTFE and a bunch of other ones.

And I know I have to play with the Resistor and Capacitor values but do you have an idea of what range of capacitance I will be using? I want to get a few of them now to play with and if I end up needing other ones I can always stop at radio shack.

As for the voltage of the capacitors I think anything that is rated for 25 to 35 V should be fine right?

Thanks again!
 
  • #37
OK, I don't know the exact threshold of the CMOS gate. Let's give an example and assume the threshold is abouty 60% of the supply voltage. Then we can use time constant \tau=RC.

Say I set R=200K, and \tau\; = 10mS \Rightarrow\; C=\frac {\tau}{200K}. So C is about 50nF. I would get a 100K resistor and a 250K trim pot and put them in series so you get from 100K to 350K. Get a bigger resistor like 300K also just in case the 10mS is not enough. Mica is good. Get one of 47000pF( 47nF) and use trim pot to get your right delay.

Find out the threshold of the gate and use the formula to adjust the value. But you don't need to buy a lot of caps, just use resistor and trim pots to land you onto the correct delay.
 
  • #38
Oh that's smart, I do have a few trimmers laying around.

Ok I'm a lot clearer now on what to get, I can't find any caps under Mica that are 47000pF though? The highest I found was 10000pf?

Are you sure its 47000?
 
  • #39
eddie90 said:
Oh that's smart, I do have a few trimmers laying around.

Ok I'm a lot clearer now on what to get, I can't find any caps under Mica that are 47000pF though? The highest I found was 10000pf?

Are you sure its 47000?

The Mylar will do. Yes, you can verify with the calculation also. I am too old to insist I am right particular after the NAND NOR thingy!
 
  • #40
yungman said:
The Mylar will do. Yes, you can verify with the calculation also. I am too old to insist I am right particular after the NAND NOR thingy!

Lol that's funny.

Anyway I made my order earlier today, can't wait for the stuff to get here!

If I may ask, how do you know so much(I looked at some of your other posts)?
I'm guessing you have a degree in EE right?
 
  • #41
eddie90 said:
Lol that's funny.

Anyway I made my order earlier today, can't wait for the stuff to get here!

If I may ask, how do you know so much(I looked at some of your other posts)?
I'm guessing you have a degree in EE right?

Thanks for the compliment.
I have been an EE for like 30 years. I never got an EE degree. Electronics is my passion and I have been studying very hard. In fact I spent the last 8 or 9 years studying like 3 hours a day 5 to 6 days a week in electronics....After I retired 6 year ago! I have to say in my almost 60 years, electronics is my number one passion.
 
  • #42
yungman said:
Thanks for the compliment.
I have been an EE for like 30 years. I never got an EE degree. Electronics is my passion and I have been studying very hard. In fact I spent the last 8 or 9 years studying like 3 hours a day 5 to 6 days a week in electronics....After I retired 6 year ago! I have to say in my almost 60 years, electronics is my number one passion.

Thats awesome, what kind of jobs have you had in the field? Let me know if I'm being too nosey btw. I'm just curious.

Also, I just went back to school and I'm working on completing my GEs so I can start an Electrical with Computer Engineering program. In your opinion, what math subjects are important when it comes to EE? I want to start refreshing my memory on math I may have lost practice in and maybe start reviewing some of the important subjects I will need in the future. I'm guessing Calculus is on of them right?

Thanks, and sorry if I'm asking a lot of questions
 
  • #43
eddie90 said:
Thats awesome, what kind of jobs have you had in the field? Let me know if I'm being too nosey btw. I'm just curious.

Also, I just went back to school and I'm working on completing my GEs so I can start an Electrical with Computer Engineering program. In your opinion, what math subjects are important when it comes to EE? I want to start refreshing my memory on math I may have lost practice in and maybe start reviewing some of the important subjects I will need in the future. I'm guessing Calculus is on of them right?
Thanks, and sorry if I'm asking a lot of questions

Depends on how far you want to go. If you want an AA degree, math is not as important. But if your goal is BSEE, math is the most important thing for EE. The electronics part is really not that hard. But when you study the upper division topics, books are written and explained in Calculus, so you can't even understand the book without knowing Calculus. Particular in electromagentics, Multi Variable Calculus ( Cal III in most schools) was party developed to give an easier explanation of Maxwell's equations., there is no simpler way to explain this topic...at least not that I know of. It is the language of science, like English for other subjects.

Calculus is important when you study EE, not exactly important in most of the real job. But it is so important that I actually stop studying EE and spent 2 years studying Calculus.

I learn this from experience, Before I even became an engineer, I had only 1 1/2 semester of Calculus from college. I studied on my own, but for years when I tried to study more advance subject like RF, Feedback control and EM, I kept running into walls. I tried to find books that are simpler, explaining in English, I couldn't find any good ones. Just 6 years ago after I retired, I decided to stop studying electronics and spent 2 years studying Calculus, Ordinary Differential Equation and I even studied Partial Differential Equation because I really want to study electromagnetics. I can tell you, I look at electronics in a different light.

It is a requirement for BSEE to complete Cal I to III and ODE. But you can get away with just Cal I to III. With good math background, you'll find it is much easier to read and understand the textbooks in EE. Electronics is the easy part, the math is the challenge, and you cannot move beyond certain point if you don't have enough math background. If you find a book that claim to cover a difficult subject like RF and EM without using calculus, watch out. I have over 7 books on EM and over 10 books in RF, it just don't work without Calculus.
 
Last edited:
  • #44
Yea I want to go for a BS. I sort of knew Calculus was important but I didnt know it was That, important. But it does make sense, many times when I've tried learning about subjects in electronics I've gotten completely stuck because all I see are math(Calculus I'm guessing) symbols.

I'm about to start reading a book I recently bought online just because of all the good reviews it has.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/096278155X/?tag=pfamazon01-20

I read a couple other books by this guy in the past that really helped me understand certain math/electronics subjects. Do you have any good calculus book recommendations for someone who is new to the subject?
 
  • #45
I got a lot of Calculus book. Buy used one on Amazon particular the early editions really cheap. Not all books are equal. I am a self studier, I don't have an instructor to ask question. So I get a bunch of cheap used books to study, when ever I have a question I cannot understand from one book, I always manage to find better answer from another book.

I found the best book I ever studied in this subject is Calculus by Howard Anton, Irl Bivens and Stephen Davis. I tried to look for the 7th or the 8th edition used for you on Amazon and I can't find it now. It was dirt cheap a year or two ago. It is not easy, but again, just because the book looks easy don't mean it is good. I was fooled to choose the book by Sherman Stein because it looked easiest. But that was a disaster when I reach muli variable. It tried to be too simple that it starting to miss the point and confused. I wasted so much time on that part. This is not for the weak of heart, you really need to button down. Anton is one of the harder ones in the intro to Calculus, it spent more time in definitions and very straight from the begining. But it turn out that is very important as you get deeper into it. Easier books tend to be more relax in definitions and equations and try to explain in English. It does not work.

Look around for a beat up copy of Anton. Get the solution manual, it is very important as you need to work through the problems.

Also This is a free download online:
http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcI/CalcI.aspx

Follow the link and download the whole Calculus I II and III. It turn out to be one of the best I've seen. It is actually quite easy...for Calculus! I learn Calculus mainly from these two sources even I have like 7 or 8 books just in this topic. Buy more used books, buy cheap. They are really cheap online as students can't get rid of it fast enough after the course! I paid average less than $30 each for a book that was over $100 new! From all my studies, I filled up two 7' book shelves! Books are gold, like Chinese saying, you'll find a gold house inside books! Every one have their our taste, just like we have our own taste with woman. Just get more used books and find one that suit you.I am glad you have the experience that you run into break walls when you get deeper in electronics. There is no way out. It's not as if you use Calculus in the EE job, but you can't get pass the learning stage without it. Why do you think after 30 years of successful career, in my old retired years, I spent 2 years studying Calculus, nothing by Calculus, ODE and PDE. It is that important. I got so much insight in EM theory just from understand Calculus ( My bad, I should never say I understand Calculus, you never understand enough! But you get my point!). It is a language.
 
Last edited:
  • #46
yungman said:
I got a lot of Calculus book. Buy used one on Amazon particular the early editions really cheap. Not all books are equal. I am a self studier, I don't have an instructor to ask question. So I get a bunch of cheap used books to study, when ever I have a question I cannot understand from one book, I always manage to find better answer from another book.

I found the best book I ever studied in this subject is Calculus by Howard Anton, Irl Bivens and Stephen Davis. I tried to look for the 7th or the 8th edition used for you on Amazon and I can't find it now. It was dirt cheap a year or two ago. It is not easy, but again, just because the book looks easy don't mean it is good. I was fooled to choose the book by Sherman Stein because it looked easiest. But that was a disaster when I reach muli variable. It tried to be too simple that it starting to miss the point and confused. I wasted so much time on that part. This is not for the weak of heart, you really need to button down. Anton is one of the harder ones in the intro to Calculus, it spent more time in definitions and very straight from the begining. But it turn out that is very important as you get deeper into it. Easier books tend to be more relax in definitions and equations and try to explain in English. It does not work.

Look around for a beat up copy of Anton. Get the solution manual, it is very important as you need to work through the problems.

Also This is a free download online:
http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcI/CalcI.aspx

Follow the link and download the whole Calculus I II and III. It turn out to be one of the best I've seen. It is actually quite easy...for Calculus! I learn Calculus mainly from these two sources even I have like 7 or 8 books just in this topic. Buy more used books, buy cheap. They are really cheap online as students can't get rid of it fast enough after the course! I paid average less than $30 each for a book that was over $100 new! From all my studies, I filled up two 7' book shelves! Books are gold, like Chinese saying, you'll find a gold house inside books! Every one have their our taste, just like we have our own taste with woman. Just get more used books and find one that suit you.


I am glad you have the experience that you run into break walls when you get deeper in electronics. There is no way out. It's not as if you use Calculus in the EE job, but you can't get pass the learning stage without it. Why do you think after 30 years of successful career, in my old retired years, I spent 2 years studying Calculus, nothing by Calculus, ODE and PDE. It is that important. I got so much insight in EM theory just from understand Calculus ( My bad, I should never say I understand Calculus, you never understand enough! But you get my point!). It is a language.

Thanks a lot, I truly appreciate all the info you gave me. I will look into the books and the online recourse you mentioned. I learn better in my own than in a class some times so this should help me start getting ready for what's coming.

P.S. I tracked my shipment and it says it arrived at California on Saturday so I should be receiving it very soon
 
  • #47
eddie90 said:
Thanks a lot, I truly appreciate all the info you gave me. I will look into the books and the online recourse you mentioned. I learn better in my own than in a class some times so this should help me start getting ready for what's coming.

P.S. I tracked my shipment and it says it arrived at California on Saturday so I should be receiving it very soon

I don't like to go to school either, I don't like the idea I am older than the professor!

Saturday?! Did you say you order from Digikey? That is slow, I always get my stuff from Digikey in 3 days! Find another place next time! I am in Calif, never wait for 4 or 5 days.

Are you living in the Bay Area? I am in San Jose area, they have Jamco in Belmont and I have Halt tech on Lawrence close to where I live. You can buy stuffs there walk in.
 
  • #48
yungman said:
I don't like to go to school either, I don't like the idea I am older than the professor!

Saturday?! Did you say you order from Digikey? That is slow, I always get my stuff from Digikey in 3 days! Find another place next time! I am in Calif, never wait for 4 or 5 days.

Are you living in the Bay Area? I am in San Jose area, they have Jamco in Belmont and I have Halt tech on Lawrence close to where I live. You can buy stuffs there walk in.

Lol yea it must not feel right. I just absorb material much better if I read it on my own. I've been told by a counselor that I have ADHD symptoms, I don't know if this has anything to do with it haha

Oh and yea, I'm not sure if you misunderstood me but I said that it got here to Cali this past Sat. It makes sense because I ordered on Thurs evening so on Sat it got to Cali and earlier today it said they received it at my local post office :D

Oh and I live in LA. I wish I knew stores like the ones you mentioned where I can just walk in. I tried searching for both of those in my area but I did not find any.

What can I search for? What would a store like that be called? All I have is radio shack, and you know they basically turned into a cell phone store now haha
 

Similar threads

Back
Top