How do i determine which valence is being used (balancing equations)

  • Thread starter Thread starter supernova1203
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balancing equations
AI Thread Summary
Determining the valence of metals, particularly transition metals like gold, is essential for balancing chemical equations. When faced with multiple valences, the valence can often be inferred from the compounds involved; for example, in Au2(SO4)3, gold must have a +3 valence to balance the +2 from sulfate ions. If the metal is presented as a free element, its valence is 0. Polyatomic ions typically have a fixed valence, simplifying the process. Understanding the context of the compounds helps clarify which valence to use when balancing equations.
supernova1203
Messages
209
Reaction score
0
In balancing chemical equations, we are given let's say the reactants side of the equation and asked to find the products and balance if neccesary, if a metal(usually transition) has multiple valences, how do i know which of the valences is being used?

this has given me trouble to no end @_@
 
Physics news on Phys.org
for instance look at this, Au has a valence of +1, +2 and +3 so how would i know beforehand which valence they are using? This equation is already balanced and the work is done for us, but in case it isnt, how do i determine that?
 
here we go

I know the polyatomic ions have only 1 valence so that's not the problem, the sulphate has a valence of 2


This is a website i got off someone on these forums a few days ago, it shows what i am talking about, some of them have several valences..

http://chemistry.about.com/library/weekly/aa122002a.htm


hope you can see the attachment i have linked in this thread.
 

Attachments

  • balancing online question.jpg
    balancing online question.jpg
    2.6 KB · Views: 587
You know the valence by looking at the salts shown. For instance, in Au2(SO4)3, the valence of the gold has to be +3 for each gold ion to balance the +2 of each of the 3 sulfate ions. The bromide salts are even easier.
 
pmsrw is correct. If they are giving it to you as a free metal the valence is 0. Otherwise you look at the compound it is in.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top