How do I find directional derivatives using partial derivatives?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arden1528
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Partial
AI Thread Summary
To find the directional derivative of the function 1 + 2x(y)^(1-2) at the point (3,4) in the direction of the vector (4,-3), one must first calculate the partial derivatives with respect to x and y. After evaluating these partial derivatives at the point (3,4), they should be multiplied by the components of a unit vector derived from (4,-3). The vector (4,-3) is not a unit vector, so it needs to be scaled to ensure its length is 1, resulting in the unit vector (4/5, -3/5). Correctly applying these steps leads to the expected answer of 23/10, confirming the calculations. Understanding the importance of using a unit vector is crucial for accurate directional derivative results.
Arden1528
I am completely stuck on these. I am supposed to find the directional derv. of 1+2x(y)^(1-2) with point (3,4) and vector (4,-3)

I understand the formula to find this. You have to find the partial derv. of x and y then plug in (3,4) to get a value. Then take the partial derv. of x and multiply it by a, and partial derv. of y multiplied by b.

fx(3,4)a+fy(3,4)b

fx=partial derv of x
fy = partial derv. of y

the answer in the back of the book is 23/10, I get 23/3. So it must be in my partials? any help is very much apperciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Don't forget that your direction vector is supposed to be a unit vector.

(4, -3) isn't quite a unit vector, so you have to scale it so it is a unit vector before you use it in the problem.


You might want to check the rest of your work again too.
 
Last edited:
What can I do to the vector (4,-3) to make it a unit vector? Multiply it till the legnth is 1?
 
Originally posted by Arden1528
What can I do to the vector (4,-3) to make it a unit vector? Multiply it till the legnth is 1?
Basically.
You want sqrt(x2+y2)=1 where x and y are the i and j components of the vector.
So
x2+y2=1
Presently you have
x2+y2=25
If you divide each side by 25 then
sqrt((x/5)2+(y/5)2)=1
So if the vector is (4/5,-3/5) then you have a unit vector.
 
Thank you so much. If I could buy you a beer and cigar I would. That is all I needed, know it all makes sense. I can not tell you how much I am greatfull. I have that feeling of solving that ever so long math problem, it's great.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top