How do I find the area between a curve and the x-axis using integration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Peter G.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Areas Integration
Peter G.
Messages
439
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Curve: x(x+1)(x-2)

Find the area between the interval: (-1 to 2)

Answer:

The first thing I did was to find the x-intercepts: x=0, x=-1 and x=2

I then integrated the curve. I got: (x4/4)-(x3/3)-(x2)

I then found the area between 0 and -1 and the area between 0 and 2. I added the absolute of both areas and got 37/12. The book, however, claims it is 2.25.

Can anyone help me please?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe your problem is in the absolute value? The area that is below the x-axis should be counted as negative.
 
Oh, I thought we used the absolute value because we want the total area under the curve. The total area under the curve would be the area below the x-axis plus the are above the x axis, no?
 
Peter G. said:
Oh, I thought we used the absolute value because we want the total area under the curve. The total area under the curve would be the area below the x-axis plus the are above the x axis, no?

That is a good question...from a purely geometric standpoint then yes. But mathematically the area below the x-axis is taken to be negative because the differential area is defined as:

dA=f(x)dx

and when f(x) is negative then that value of dA will also be negative since dx is positive. This will become second nature to you as you work more problems and see real world integration applications in other courses.
 
Also another tip...you don't need to worry about splitting the interval up according to the roots, the sign of f(x) will take care of everything. There is nothing wrong with splitting the integral up, but it is not necessary for most simple continuous functions.
 
Oh, I see. Thanks a lot for the help! I figured now that when the book wants me to perform what I described in the first post they ask for the total area. This question, however, simply asks me to evaluate the integral.

Thanks once again,
PeterG.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top