skyza said:
This is how I've done it so far. I have to use synthetic division. I tried -1 & 1 and neither worked, so I tried 3
In essence, you're using the Rational Root Theorem, as I mentioned. The way the question was phrased (giving you a complex factor) seems to be against this approach. Nevertheless, it'll give you the right answer.
BTW, you don't have to test each of those candidate roots by division! Just substitute them back into f(x) and see if the expression becomes zero. In this case, f(3) = 0, so (x-3) is a factor of f(x).
Now, looking at your synthetic division of f(x) over (x-3), the first step's fine. You ended up with (1, -4, 5, 0) in a row. With that, you're actually done. That row of numbers signifies a quadratic polynomial, with the first three numbers representing the respective coefficient from x
2 down to the constant term. The final zero represents the remainder after division - you expect this to be 0, because (x-3) is a factor of f(x). I don't know why you continued writing numbers below that row, it's not necessary, and that's why you got a wrong answer.
So the quadratic factor is x
2 - 4x + 5.
The final factorisation of f(x) = (x-3)(x
2 - 4x + 5).
Note that the quadratic factor x
2 - 4x + 5 has a negative discriminant (the b
2 - 4ac thing), so you can conclude that it has no real linear factors. If you want to try to factorise it, you'll end up with (x-z
1)(x-z
2), where z
1 and z
2 are complex conjugates. In fact, you were given the value of one of the complex numbers at the start of the question, and here it's (2-i). So x
2 - 4x + 5 = (x - (2-i))(x-(2+i)) = (x-2+i)(x-2-i).