How do I incorporate electric fields into capacitors?

AI Thread Summary
Electric fields in capacitors are directly proportional to voltage, meaning that if voltage increases, the electric field also increases proportionally. The relevant equation connecting voltage (V) and electric field (E) is V = ED, where D is the distance between capacitor plates. Energy stored (U) is not the same as electric field; U represents energy, while E represents the field strength. Understanding this relationship clarifies how changes in voltage affect the electric field in capacitors. Overall, the key takeaway is that doubling the voltage results in a doubling of the electric field strength.
MinaciousOviraptor
Messages
5
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
A capacitor with a value of C stores a charge Q and has an electric field E between the plates when a voltage V is across it. What will the new value of the electric field be if:

a) the voltage is 2V
b) the voltage is 4V
Relevant Equations
U=(1/2)CV^2
U=(1/2)QV
U= (1/2)Q^2V
Q=CV
I know that I’m supposed to use proportional reasoning, but where does electric field even fit in? For whatever equation, I know I’m supposed to see how increasing the voltage by either 2 and 4 volts related to electric field. If electric field is the same as “U”, then wouldn’t it be U=(1/2)*(1)*(3V) using the equation U=(1/2)QV?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How does electric field relate to voltage? (That's all you need.)
 
Doc Al said:
How does electric field relate to voltage? (That's all you need.)
But what’s the relevant equation? Is E-field the same as U?
 
MinaciousOviraptor said:
Is E-field the same as U?
No. U is energy stored. Read the link I gave above.
 
MinaciousOviraptor said:
Homework Statement:: A capacitor with a value of C stores a charge Q and has an electric field E between the plates when a voltage V is across it. What will the new value of the electric field be if:

a) the voltage is 2V
b) the voltage is 4V
Relevant Equations:: U=(1/2)CV^2
U=(1/2)QV
U= (1/2)Q^2V
Q=CV

I know that I’m supposed to use proportional reasoning, but where does electric field even fit in? For whatever equation, I know I’m supposed to see how increasing the voltage by either 2 and 4 volts related to electric field. If electric field is the same as “U”, then wouldn’t it be U=(1/2)*(1)*(3V) using the equation U=(1/2)QV?
Do you have original question?
Why U=(1/2)QV and U=(1/2)Q^2V?
(1/2)QV≠(1/2)Q^2V.I can't understand it.
Could you explain it?
 
YanZhen said:
Do you have original question?
Why U=(1/2)QV and U=(1/2)Q^2V?
(1/2)QV≠(1/2)Q^2V.I can't understand it.
Could you explain it?
2B5A080D-3B47-49A5-ABC8-F3B0AE1A106B.jpeg
It’s number 5- but that’s literally all it says. I don’t see a relationship to prior problems
 
E=U/d
d is a constant
so Ea=2E Eb=4E
and U is like mgh,E is like g.one in the electric field,one in the force field.
understand?
 
MinaciousOviraptor said:
Relevant Equations:: U=(1/2)CV^2
U=(1/2)QV
U= (1/2)Q^2V
Q=CV
The highlighted equation is incorrect.

As I stated before, you won't need any of these. Just the relationship between V and E. (Read the link I gave.)
 
  • #10
C=Q/V C is a constant
E=F/q=((kQq)/(d^2))/q=kQ/(d^2)=kCV/(d^2)
is this the answer you want?
 
  • #11
YanZhen said:
C=Q/V C is a constant
E=F/q=((kQq)/(d^2))/q=kQ/(d^2)=kCV/(d^2)
is this the answer you want?
This is misleading and wrong. You are misleading the OP by asserting that the total charges ##\pm Q##, which are distributed uniformly over the plates, are point charges. It is wrong because the field due to two point charges is the superposition of two ##1/r## fields while the field between the capacitor plates is uniform and does not depend on ##r##.
 
  • #12
kuruman said:
This is misleading and wrong. You are misleading the OP by asserting that the total charges ##\pm Q##, which are distributed uniformly over the plates, are point charges. It is wrong because the field due to two point charges is the superposition of two ##1/r## fields while the field between the capacitor plates is uniform and does not depend on ##r##.
so,how should we describe the relationship between V and E?
i'm so out of ideas.
 
  • #13
YanZhen said:
so,how should we describe the relationship between V and E?
Read the link I gave in an earlier post.
 
  • Like
Likes MinaciousOviraptor
  • #14
Doc Al said:
Read the link I gave in an earlier post.
emmm.i can't open it.
could you send me the content?thank you:biggrin:
 
  • #15
Doc Al said:
YanZhen said:
emmm.i can't open it.
could you send me the content?thank you:biggrin:
You really can't open the Hyperphysics link? I wonder if it's some country blocking thing for your ISP. Here is a snapshot:

1666621988470.png
 
  • #16
berkeman said:
I wonder if it's some country blocking thing for your ISP.
Probably the Great Firewall. OP has self-identified as being in China.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #17
kuruman said:
Probably the Great Firewall. OP has self-identified as being in China.
yes
 
  • #18
Doc Al said:
Read the link I gave in an earlier post.
So I’m disregarding Capacitance and Charge and just focusing on the relationship between V and E—> V=ED. If V=2V then E would also be 2
 
  • #19
MinaciousOviraptor said:
So I’m disregarding Capacitance and Charge and just focusing on the relationship between V and E—> V=ED. If V=2V then E would also be 2
Yes, it's that simple. Doubling the voltage doubles the electric field -- they are proportional.
 
  • Like
Likes MinaciousOviraptor
  • #20
Doc Al said:
Yes, it's that simple. Doubling the voltage doubles the electric field -- they are proportional.
Thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes Doc Al and berkeman
Back
Top