How do I make more smaller sidelobelevel value of patch antenna?

  • Thread starter Thread starter everjordan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antenna Value
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on optimizing a 6x1 series fed microstrip rectangular patch antenna designed using HFSS, aiming for a sidelobe level (SLL) of less than -25dB and a return loss (S11) of less than -20dB. Initial designs yielded an SLL around -20dB, prompting adjustments to the patch width and connection line length, with calculations performed using MATLAB to refine these parameters. Despite modifications, the SLL remained between -10 to -15dB, leading to further changes in the patch width and connection line length, resulting in an SLL of approximately -20dB. The user seeks additional advice or references to achieve a lower SLL, indicating a need for advanced techniques or methodologies.
everjordan
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi :)

I am designing 6x1 series fed microstrip rectangular patch antenna by using HFSS.
The schematic of the my design is below.
attachment.php?attachmentid=35967&stc=1&d=1306489779.jpg


This figure is the half of my design for the past analysis.


My goal is below.

SLL(side lobe level <-25dB)
S11(<-20dB)

After I design the patch antenna, I found SLL around -20dB.
However, I want to reduce this value.

So, I check the internet & some papers and found some important parameters.
1. both width and length of patch antenna
2. length of the connection line
{
connection line is the microstrip line.
connection line exits between patch and another patch.
connection line has high impedance[100ohms].
I set the length of line L-2delta(L) {L is the length of the patch antenna}
}

And below is the parameters for antenna.
resonance freq = 26GHz
permitivity = 2.2
height of the substrate = 0.79mm
The values of effective permitivity, both length and width of the patch antenna
are below.

222.jpg


I found that the calculated values are not perfect value.
So I have changed the value such as width of the patch antenna, length of the connection line.

If the width of patch antenna is changed, length of the patch antenna also will be changed.
So, I use MATLAB tool then change the length of the patch antenna and effective permitivity.

These are MATLAB code.

{
% method to obtain patch's length
clc;
clear all;
h = 0.79;
w = 4.53;
er = 2.2;
ee = ((er+1)./2 ) + ((er-1)./2).*(1+12.*h./w)^(-0.5);
f = 26.*(10^(9));
c = 3.*10.^(8);

deltal = h.*0.412.*(ee+0.3).*((w./h) + 0.264)./(ee-0.258)./((w./h) + 0.8) ;
l = 0.5.*3.*(10.^(8))./f./sqrt(ee) - 2.*deltal./1000;
l = l*1000;

w

deltal
l
deltal+l

}

First I set these values to my desin.
However, value of SLL is only around -10~-15dB.
So, I changed width of patch antenna to lambda/2.
And I changed length of the connection line to L-delta(L).
As a result, value of SLL is around -20dB.
333.jpg

To reduce the value of SLL, I change the length of the connection line to -0.01mm incremental.
However, the variation is a little.

How do I make smaller value of SLL?

If u give some advices or some references, it will be helpful.
Thank you~!
 

Attachments

  • 111.jpg
    111.jpg
    15.2 KB · Views: 503
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
From what I remember in my antenna class, we've symbolically derived the pattern for array factor(I think), for specific size of an antenna array. Then, depending on the value of sidelobe value desired, appropriate filter coefficients were calculated to achieve the desired sidelobe values. These were equated to the terms in the radiation pattern. I used Chebyshev polynomials in the example below.

%part c
N=10;
theta_a=-90:.1:90;
betaa=0;
betab=-90;
psia=180*sind(theta_a)+betaa;
psib=180*sind(theta_a)+betab;
Af1=2/N*(cosd((2*1-1)*psia/2)+cosd((2*2-1)*psia/2)+cosd((2*3-1)*psia/2)+cosd((2*4-1)*psia/2)+cosd((2*5-1)*psia/2));
Af2=2/N*(cosd((2*1-1)*psib/2)+cosd((2*2-1)*psib/2)+cosd((2*3-1)*psib/2)+cosd((2*4-1)*psib/2)+cosd((2*5-1)*psib/2));
figure(1);
subplot(2,1,1),plot(theta_a, 20*log10(abs(Af1))), axis([-90 90 -50 0]), xlabel('theta'), ylabel('|AFn|dB'), title('Pr.3c Normalized AF vs. theta, theta0=0 deg'), grid on;
subplot(2,1,2),plot(theta_a, 20*log10(abs(Af2))), axis([-90 90 -50 0]), xlabel('theta'), ylabel('|AFn|dB'), title('Pr.3c Normalized AF vs. theta, theta0=30 deg'), grid on;%part d-e
SLL=-30;
R=10^(-SLL/20);
u0=cosh(1/(N-1)*acosh(R));
psi=10:10:50;
%[A]=*
B=zeros(5,5);
A=zeros(1,5);
%Td is the Chebyshev polynomial
for c=1:1:5;
u=u0*cosd(psi(c)/2);
A(c)=cosh((N-1)*acosh(u)); %Td(u)
for i=1:1:5;
B(c,i)=2*cosd((2*i-1)/2*psi(c));
end
end

A=A';
IB=inv(B);
I=IB*A;

Af3=2/(N*I(3))*(I(1)*cosd((2*1-1)*psia/2)+I(2)*cosd((2*2-1)*psia/2)+I(3)*cosd((2*3-1)*psia/2)+I(4)*cosd((2*4-1)*psia/2)+I(5)*cosd((2*5-1)*psia/2));
Af4=2/(N*I(3))*(I(1)*cosd((2*1-1)*psib/2)+I(2)*cosd((2*2-1)*psib/2)+I(3)*cosd((2*3-1)*psib/2)+I(4)*cosd((2*4-1)*psib/2)+I(5)*cosd((2*5-1)*psib/2));
figure(2);
subplot(2,1,1),plot(theta_a, 20*log10(abs(Af3))), axis([-90 90 -50 0]), xlabel('theta'), ylabel('|AFn|dB'), title('Pr.3e Normalized AF vs. theta, theta0=0 deg'), grid on;
subplot(2,1,2),plot(theta_a, 20*log10(abs(Af4))), axis([-90 90 -50 0]), xlabel('theta'), ylabel('|AFn|dB'), title('Pr.3e Normalized AF vs. theta, theta0=30 deg'), grid on;
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top